fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 年前Soupmander.xyzimagemessage-square157linkfedilinkarrow-up1661arrow-down15
arrow-up1656arrow-down1imageSoupmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 年前message-square157linkfedilink
minus-squareGrass@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前Theoretically with consent, assuming the consent based veganism.
minus-squareEvil_Shrubbery@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前Normally yes, because you can’t do more for nature & people than that. But in this case it’s just too late, the rich already turned into regular (tho toxic) meat as it neared the end of its life. Now, if you get a regular not-about-to-die rich and turn it into a smoothie, then yes, vegan gazpacho.
But eating the rich is vegan, no?
Theoretically with consent, assuming the consent based veganism.
Normally yes, because you can’t do more for nature & people than that.
But in this case it’s just too late, the rich already turned into regular (tho toxic) meat as it neared the end of its life.
Now, if you get a regular not-about-to-die rich and turn it into a smoothie, then yes, vegan gazpacho.