mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoFCC explicitly prohibits fast lanes, closing possible net neutrality loopholearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square32linkfedilinkarrow-up1380arrow-down12
arrow-up1378arrow-down1external-linkFCC explicitly prohibits fast lanes, closing possible net neutrality loopholearstechnica.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square32linkfedilink
minus-squarexePBMg9@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down1·1 year agoThe type of traffic shaping you are thinking off can still be done under net nutrailty and was never an issue.
minus-squarexenspidey@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down30·1 year agoThe things NN is trying to “solve” was never an issue either
minus-squareKraiden@kbin.runlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·1 year agoNet neutrality is the status quo, it’s not trying to “solve” anything
minus-squarexenspidey@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·1 year agoIf it was the status quo then why have rules?
minus-squareShepherdPie@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoThen it shouldn’t be an issue to implement it then right?
minus-squarexenspidey@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·1 year agoBut there’s never been an issue… Should Netflix pay more for their increased traffic… Yes, it’s not equal to my browsing.
The type of traffic shaping you are thinking off can still be done under net nutrailty and was never an issue.
The things NN is trying to “solve” was never an issue either
Net neutrality is the status quo, it’s not trying to “solve” anything
If it was the status quo then why have rules?
Then it shouldn’t be an issue to implement it then right?
But there’s never been an issue… Should Netflix pay more for their increased traffic… Yes, it’s not equal to my browsing.