• fathog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    What about people who need money to not only survive but to continue making art? What separates art from, say, coding, as a form of labor that is not worth compensation? Is an artist’s work not worthy of adequate compensation?

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It is a statistical fact that people who pirate things tend to buy more things than people who never pirate anything. Furthermore, people who exclusively pirate are a minority. It is also a fact that the majority of pirates would rather pay for things if the service provided is a superior experience to that of piracy.

      Gabe Newell said “Piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem.”

    • zbb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Coding isn’t always compensated. Open source projects thrive because of the work of developers that don’t get paid in most cases. That doesn’t stop them (although it’s probably because they do other work and can spare time and money).

      My point is that both, art and coding, don’t require compensation. Many people do both for the sake of it.

      That doesn’t mean they don’t deserve compensation (in the form of donations). They do, most than any other.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      People who can’t pay experiencing their creative work doesn’t take anything away from them. Complain about the lack of funding for art instead