• benwubbleyou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        So is arguing that because an organization has corruption and bad things happen in it that the whole thing is worth throwing away. If that was the case you would have to consider all governments, organizations, systems and businesses that are inherently faulty are worth the same dismantling.

        It’s almost as if all things made by human hands are faulty and can’t be repaired or something.

        • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not all things, just organized religions. There’s a fine difference between “an organization has corruption and bad things happen” and “an organization has no point to exist other than to protect corruption and bad things within itself”. At least government gives me something when I pay taxes to it

        • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Wow, what a fucking disingenuous argument. How disgusting do you have to be to wave away systemic child rape with “some corruption and bad things happen”?

          How about you examine why you think that dismantling an organisation that shields these people is a controversial idea? I don’t care if it’s a government, company, charity, any fucking place that is found to systemically protect child rapists needs to go, period. If you’re not comfortable with that idea, you should probably be asking yourself some questions.