• vithigar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The observable effect is the same either way. If light is infinitely fast and causality propagates at c then it’s still going to take (distance to the mirror / c) for the fact that you turned on the light to reach the mirror, and that same amount of time for the fact that the light reflected to propagate back to you.

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Those two things don’t square. If you’re moving relative to the mirror when your fire the photon, it would hit in a different place than if you were stationary. The photon can’t be moving infinitely fast in your reference frame for that to happen.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah I think infinite is the wrong word for them to use there. Maybe call it maximally fast? Like it goes as fast as possible no matter your reference frame, but that speed is limited by the speed of causality. The photon has 100% of its skill points in speed through space and 0% on speed through time.

      • vithigar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Would it? What does “stationary” mean when discussing relative velocities? The mirror being stationary and the person firing the photon moving at a constant velocity is literally an indistinguishable scenario from a stationary person firing the photon at a moving mirror.

        If I am moving relative to a mirror when I fire the photon, then the mirror is moving relative to me, and will be in a different relative position by the time the “event” of my firing that photon reaches it.

        Also, the photon isn’t moving infinitely fast in my (the firer’s) reference frame. It’s moving infinitely fast in it’s own reference frame.

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah I eventually picked up that that’s what you meant in your original comment, not that photons move instantaneously and that causality somehow catches up later.