Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 11か月前Maybe this is better for everyonelocklemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square451fedilinkarrow-up1591arrow-down1100
arrow-up1491arrow-down1external-linkMaybe this is better for everyonelocklemmy.worldRoflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 11か月前message-square451fedilink
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11か月前 If it’s free then throwing it out costs nothing though, right? but replacing it would cost something. throwing away perfectly good food isn’t something most people think is a moral good.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·11か月前I thought your point was to disregard the morality of the diet and focus on the economics?
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11か月前this subthread was about beaver’s misleading link.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·11か月前Their link was addressing the claim that eating vegan is a luxury. For what the comment was responding to I think it was perfectly well framed, but you can extrapolate anything you want from it if that’s your thing.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11か月前 heir link was addressing the claim that eating vegan is a luxury. and it did so misleadingly, as being in teh position to always pay full price for food at a store is a luxury.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11か月前 as being in teh position to always pay full price for food at a store is a luxury. Not if by ‘cost’ they meant ‘cost’, and not ‘what they get from the state at no cost’
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11か月前if i have food, throwing it away and getting more food is more expensive.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11か月前The paper wasn’t discussing food stamp programs or even what food you might already have
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11か月前right. it’s simply not scoped to support the claim tha being vegan is 30% cheaper
but replacing it would cost something. throwing away perfectly good food isn’t something most people think is a moral good.
I thought your point was to disregard the morality of the diet and focus on the economics?
this subthread was about beaver’s misleading link.
Their link was addressing the claim that eating vegan is a luxury.
For what the comment was responding to I think it was perfectly well framed, but you can extrapolate anything you want from it if that’s your thing.
and it did so misleadingly, as being in teh position to always pay full price for food at a store is a luxury.
Not if by ‘cost’ they meant ‘cost’, and not ‘what they get from the state at no cost’
if i have food, throwing it away and getting more food is more expensive.
The paper wasn’t discussing food stamp programs or even what food you might already have
right. it’s simply not scoped to support the claim tha being vegan is 30% cheaper