psychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agoBluesky Might End Up Defeating Twitter Once and for Allslate.comexternal-linkmessage-square183fedilinkarrow-up1599arrow-down128
arrow-up1571arrow-down1external-linkBluesky Might End Up Defeating Twitter Once and for Allslate.compsychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agomessage-square183fedilink
minus-squarecRazi_man@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down21·edit-22 hours ago[Deleted] I’ve made a huge mistake breaking my personal rule to avoid all political content and I’ve regretted that immediately
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·12 hours agoWell, except for the people that are dead from his actions. For example, the ~461,000 people who died from COVID due to him making every wrong decision. For those people, it doesn’t go on. Because they’re dead.
minus-squareBilliam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·16 hours ago Trump was already elected before and quickly became irrelevant after his 4 years. And who is going to be the next US President? And who is nominating a Russian asset to be DNI? And who is nominating a child sex trafficker to be AG?
minus-squareJaymesRS@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·edit-215 hours agoDobbs and Chevron would disagree with your claim of “irrelevant”. You might not be aware, but that’s not the same thing…
[Deleted]
I’ve made a huge mistake breaking my personal rule to avoid all political content and I’ve regretted that immediately
Well, except for the people that are dead from his actions. For example, the ~461,000 people who died from COVID due to him making every wrong decision. For those people, it doesn’t go on. Because they’re dead.
And who is going to be the next US President?
And who is nominating a Russian asset to be DNI?
And who is nominating a child sex trafficker to be AG?
Dobbs and Chevron would disagree with your claim of “irrelevant”. You might not be aware, but that’s not the same thing…