• silasmariner@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    I know it’s not a very hip position right now but I think the incoming administration will turn out to be mostly hype. They’ll get bogged down trying to get the blue states to comply with some insane piece of legislation on something with no federal jurisdiction, and blame their failure to do anything on that.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m sorry, but that sounds like copium to me. Why would this fascist authoritarian regime be less successful than all of the other big fascist authoritarian regimes in history? They don’t care about the law.

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        They already had to drop Gaetz as a nominee. Likely because too many R senators said nah.

        While I’m not going to say this will happen with all the other crazy proposals. If some Copium helps us get through the next 2 years minimum, and we can stay in the fight, maybe we can hold on to this place.

        Even fentanyl works on pain for a while, let’s just hope the country isn’t in hospice yet.

      • silasmariner@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        I instinctively downvoted this because ‘copium’ is one of those load words that carries distain without engagement. Why? Because they usually are unsuccessful. They usually fizzle out. Some authoritarian regimes achieve weight and have a war, but that’s not always the case. UKs govt was borderline insane for, like, 8 years and that’s kinda mellowed now. France has had its flirtations, but it never really stuck. And ultimately I’m an optimist. And the word ‘copium’ is just short hand for ‘optimists are naive and wrong’ which… feels unwarranted to me

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          30 days ago

          I’m sorry, but I feel that optimism, in this case, is both naïve and wrong.

          That is not a word I generally throw freely around.

          • silasmariner@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            30 days ago

            Yeah well fair play. I think you’re cynical, wrong, and actively increasing the probability of your unwanted outcome coming to pass by your language, so I guess we both just very strongly disagree with each other. But at least we can do it politely so at least there’s some hope.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              30 days ago

              I am, without a doubt, cynical. I will happily accept that label. And I hope for everyone’s sake that I am wrong.

      • limelight79@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        They had the same situation the first two years of Trump’s first presidency. The blame did no good.

        Mostly what saved us before was the incompetence, and that’s already rearing its head again. Stupid thing to rely upon, though.

    • microphone900@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m thinking similarly and that the Democrats will use the Senate filibuster to block as many things as they can. Of course, conservatives may end up changing the filibuster and ram through all their terrible policies, then they’d only have until the midterms to pass all the crazy stuff they want to pass. Unless they figure out an illegitimate way to stay in power and go full fascist authoritarian on us. No matter what, the next few years are gonna be terrible.