• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    11 months ago

    Tesla drivers are oblivious to any kind of spatial understanding of the road around them

    I blame the design that forces you to keep your eyes off the road. Making a left turn? Don’t look left, take your eyes off the road and look down at the screen on your right to see the left lane warning. Wipers need adjustment? Take your eyes off the road and look at the touch screen because there are no buttons.

    Now that there is data, maybe the highway administration can force Tesla to put driver safety ahead of esthetics.

    • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’m sure that’s one contributing factor, but I’d bet that the biggest issue is that the car is made to go fast. People who drive faster end up in more accidents. Hence why Audi / BMW drivers are also stereotypically bad drivers - they are both brands with a high-acceleration profile.

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        The “faster=more accidents” thing is actually kind of up in the air. Like with many things, it’s a bell curve, but driving a few MPH over the limit appears to be safest. Supposedly because people who drive a little bit faster tend to pay more attention. Sure, there are the outliers like the people who weave through traffic at 100MPH, but only a few over the limit appears safest.

        Some of the highest accident rates actually come from people who regularly go under the limit. Because those are the people who are geriatric, distracted, texting, drunk, high, etc. and are going slower because they want the extra stopping distance or don’t want to be pulled over for speeding. Plus there’s all the hazards associated with going slow on the highway, when you’re only doing 45 MPH and traffic is flying past you in the next lane at 75. At that point, you’re practically a moving road hazard.

        • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          As far as I can tell that’s not at all the case in Sweden where I live, in fact geriatric or slow drivers are very rarely involved in accidents. Intoxicated drivers are extremely rare compared to most other countries. See e.g. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/sweden-road-safety.pdf which says “Inappropriate speed is one of the leading causes of road crashes”. You can find more research saying similar things on Google, e.g. that for every 10 km/h increase, the risk of an accident increases by 33 percent.

          But it’s not just a matter of having a high overall speed. It’s also how quickly you accelerate / break. BMW/Audio/Tesla drivers have a high capacity for acceleration and they use it e.g. to overtake in situations when others wouldn’t. I suspect the cause/effect is the other way around though: if you’re a reckless driver who doesn’t care about safety, you’re more likely to choose a car that has a lot of power.

        • catmtking@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I posit that the amount of potential acceleration may be more correlated than the raw speed. Accelerating quickly makes you less predictable to the drivers around you and reduces the control you have over your own car.

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Could it be the that nervous and less confident drivers are the ones that drive at or slightly below the speed limit?

          Maybe it’s not that driving faster is safer but worse drivers drive slower to attempt to compensate.

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s the reason why my friend wants to get one even though he dislikes Elon. One of the faster ev cars out there.

    • Fogle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      The wiper thing used to be an issue for sure, thankfully now you can use the wheel buttons to do it. Also for turning you really don’t need to look at anything. I’m not saying people don’t but you don’t need to. There are still a few things that are somewhat annoying mainly the defrost/defog but I feel like I look the same amount as I did in my other car to push those buttons as well

      • not_again@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        The voice commands work as well as anything. It’s much easier to push the roller button on the steering wheel and say “turn on defroster” than to manipulate controls (either on a touch screen or non-touch screen interface)

        • TheDubh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Voice controls are great, unless you have a strong accent it doesn’t understand, a speech impediment, or mute. Which are all things that normally wouldn’t disqualify you from driving a car. Which I feel like should disqualify them from the discussion of physical vs tablets myself.