It’s really weird how much emotion is in all of these responses but it’s really silly when you then claim I am being emotional.
I’ve made no claims to my moral superiority but you and other have. That is a paradox.
We disagree on something. Calling me childish is a bully tactic.
I am true to myself and that offends people in weird silly ways. It results in them applying their imagined prejudices to me.
These are all logical fallacies and if there is one thing I’ve learned over the year is that those who deploy them are not worth arguing with and this is such an occurrence.
I knew it would lead here because the internet is predictable because people are predictable.
For example you will now ignore me or responses with an emotional response, dismisal of my position and list of logical facllicies you feel I am using because you aren’t interesting in a discussion.
You’re literally just defending why it’s ok for you to be a bad person.
All I did was call out people for being bad people. You getting offended and defending why making fun of people is ok is childish. You then getting offended about being called about just proves how immature you are.
The only part of you I know as an individual is that you defend people making fun of other people appearances. No part of me wants to continue finding out who you are.
Go make fun of someone’s political or envirmental beliefs and I may support you more. But to defend someone after they go after the way someone else wants thier own body to look? Nah, I’m good
Cool. And yet you keep responding and so what does that say about you? What compels you to continue this demonstration? Do you feel your superior virtue has not be made clear?
It feels like you need to silence me and your method involves intimidating me. What is your justification for this.
Why do draw the line at beliefs? This is all endless curious to me.
I am most curious why your curiosity has this hardline and what makes you feel so extremely justified, so certain. All this allowing you to draw a hard line here of all places.
I expect you won’t elaborate but I suspect it is all based on emotion and not logic.
I’m not sure if it was your another that indicated I should fear being body shamed myself and so how much of all this is based on your fear of being body shamed.
I know mine is partly based on not giving a shit if someone wants to make fun of me because I would never give another person that power over me.
It’s really weird how much emotion is in all of these responses but it’s really silly when you then claim I am being emotional.
I’ve made no claims to my moral superiority but you and other have. That is a paradox.
We disagree on something. Calling me childish is a bully tactic.
I am true to myself and that offends people in weird silly ways. It results in them applying their imagined prejudices to me.
These are all logical fallacies and if there is one thing I’ve learned over the year is that those who deploy them are not worth arguing with and this is such an occurrence.
I knew it would lead here because the internet is predictable because people are predictable.
For example you will now ignore me or responses with an emotional response, dismisal of my position and list of logical facllicies you feel I am using because you aren’t interesting in a discussion.
You need me to be a bad person
You’re literally just defending why it’s ok for you to be a bad person.
All I did was call out people for being bad people. You getting offended and defending why making fun of people is ok is childish. You then getting offended about being called about just proves how immature you are.
Be better
The issue here is still you thinking I’m offended. I’m not. You continue to insist I am and insist you know my motivations.
You and I disagree I what a bad person is. I can accept that. Why can’t you?
I posted this knowing it would get called out. Literally just said that. It appears you’ve having trouble understanding what I am saying.
I think this makes you a bad person. If you disagree then by your own rules that makes you childish. Does this help you see the fallacy of your logic?
You’re not offended, you just continuously respond defending someone who would theoretically be offended.
Got it
Your assumptions for my reasons for responding is based on your personal biases. It indicates a lack of curiosity as to who I am as in individual.
The only part of you I know as an individual is that you defend people making fun of other people appearances. No part of me wants to continue finding out who you are.
Go make fun of someone’s political or envirmental beliefs and I may support you more. But to defend someone after they go after the way someone else wants thier own body to look? Nah, I’m good
Cool. And yet you keep responding and so what does that say about you? What compels you to continue this demonstration? Do you feel your superior virtue has not be made clear?
It feels like you need to silence me and your method involves intimidating me. What is your justification for this.
Why do draw the line at beliefs? This is all endless curious to me.
I am most curious why your curiosity has this hardline and what makes you feel so extremely justified, so certain. All this allowing you to draw a hard line here of all places.
I expect you won’t elaborate but I suspect it is all based on emotion and not logic.
I’m not sure if it was your another that indicated I should fear being body shamed myself and so how much of all this is based on your fear of being body shamed.
I know mine is partly based on not giving a shit if someone wants to make fun of me because I would never give another person that power over me.
It’s very simple:
If you are being a jerk or defending someone being a jerk, I will not be, nor do I have to be, nice to you
Good day