pbpza@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Linux@lemmy.ml · 9 months agoTIL that operating system Linux is an example of anarcho-communismen.wikipedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square292fedilinkarrow-up1541arrow-down1108
arrow-up1433arrow-down1external-linkTIL that operating system Linux is an example of anarcho-communismen.wikipedia.orgpbpza@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Linux@lemmy.ml · 9 months agomessage-square292fedilink
minus-squaretherealjcdenton@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down13·edit-29 months agoThere are still laws and it has stability so no it’s not
minus-squareUnmapped@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down1·8 months agoAnarchy means no rulers. No hierarchy. There would still be rules/laws.
minus-squarechobeat@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·8 months agoCommenting with no clue what people are talking about
minus-squareCowbee [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·8 months agoAnarchy isn’t a rejection of structure, but a complex web of horizontal structures.
There are still laws and it has stability so no it’s not
Anarchy means no rulers. No hierarchy. There would still be rules/laws.
Commenting with no clue what people are talking about
Anarchy isn’t a rejection of structure, but a complex web of horizontal structures.