• Tak@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lol “anarchistic country” If a people were ever to have anarchy it would require there be no country. You’re like asking them to find an incel that isn’t a misogynist

              • Tak@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Good point. I didn’t know the background or history of the word.

                  • Tak@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Lol I could if I was desperate to be right but I think I used the wrong word to describe what I intended and you can clearly see that. It’s so difficult to pin down meaning on culturally developing words just due to how fluid languages can be. I intended for it to be a clear-cut example of things that can’t exist but you’ve clearly shown it isn’t so clear cut.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Human OS is not ready to be without borders unfortunately. One day, after the last smog-filled breath of air is forcefully exhumed, and all the world’s treasures fail the last baron of wealth, we will be ready. As long as our hearts are wholly material, the world will stay the same.

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        We literally didn’t have borders as they exist today until a century ago lmao

        The human os isn’t ready for a borderless world my entire ass

        • stevehobbes@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Humans have built societies with rules for forever.

          And banish people outside their society.

          I’m not an expert on the theory of all of this, but it seems entirely dubious that anarchy could function in any environment for long.

            • stevehobbes@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              In what way isn’t it? How were the borders of the France different than the Roman Empire or Mesopotamia?

              • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Literally the free movement of people? Borders used to be “the zone of control of a government” and couldnt really exist as checkpoints for people moving back and forth over the border.

                • stevehobbes@lemy.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  That feels like a distinction without a difference? The vast vast majority of physical land borders are effectively open everywhere worldwide still today.

                  The zone of control of a government just kicks you out if they don’t want you?

                  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    There is a massive difference if you can practically establish who is allowed into and out of a country