Netflix is turning into cable TV::After the loss of behind-the-scenes talent and the acquisition of rights to WWE, Netflix is starting to feel more and more like basic cable.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Its worse than them becoming cable tv: They’re BORING tv now. I imagine a large segment comes and goes when Stranger Things releases, which is a bad read. Less than a decade ago, we all saw Netflix as the second coming of HBO. Now its just bad tv.

    Also I figured the rates would go up after the WWE deal, and I was right: they axed the lowest ad tier the day after.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    WWE? Lol they think that’s must have TV?

    5 billion for ten years? Lolol. Oh my sides. It’s not even an acquisition. It’s 500 million a year for fake wrestling.

    • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I mean, as shitty as it is, there’s a decent sized market for it. Probably worth it to them to overpay so much for it to hurt the current streaming provider, Peacock.

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I think it’s ignorant to call it “shitty” or “fake wrestling”.

        Pro-wrestling entertainment is a form of camp theater, like drag shows. It’s an old, cherished artform with a wide, passionate audience that outsiders routinely dismiss because they don’t get it.

        I don’t watch it. It doesn’t appeal to me. But I know people who love it. I think it’s largely class elitism that perpetuates the misconception that this form of performance art is somehow unrespectable. It’s not, it’s challenging, dangerous, physically demanding theater.

        Edit: For those confused or skeptical, check out Super Eyepatch Wolf’s captivating media analysis “The Undertaker: Long term story telling in wrestling”

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Well it ain’t wrestling, so it’s fake wrestling. Those are the words I use to describe it. You may think it’s “ignorant” to call it such, but I’m not ignorant of its history or how it’s done (in fact I’ve always been impressed by the athleticism that’s obviously required). So my label isn’t from ignorance.

          It’s as lame as soap operas. And I do look down my nose at people who watch that garbage too, or the garbage of most “reality” TV, or melodrama.

          It’s all just trite and juvenile appeals to base emotion, nothing more.

          There’s not even a wink and a nudge from the actors to the audience.

          Any other words you’d like to gatekeep?

          • Dadd Volante@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            You are definitely ignorant to it’s history and execution. That’s not an insult.

            But you don’t get to pretend you throughly understand something you admittedly don’t even have any interest in, or have spent any time studying.

            It’s not gatekeeping. You’re pretending to know things you don’t have a basic understanding of.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Can’t we have one thread on the Internet where we take the piss out of “manly” men in full costume including tights and makeup throwing each other around and performing “manly” acrobatics / gymnastics without having to bend over for the sanctity of the viewing audience?

          I guess not, I guess we have to have a (righteous) turd in every punch bowl.

          • Andy@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            You CAN take he piss out of anything you want. It’s just that if your take is uninformed, don’t grouse when someone says, ‘Oh! Here’s some context so you can know more about this thing! Enjoy knowing something new!’

            • aesthelete@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              The Internet is just full of annoying nags about every single issue. In one thread on here today I bumped into a guy who claimed to be pro-“eat the rich” at the same time as he was against asking them pointed questions. People just love to be holier than thou or contrarian or both I suppose. 🤷

          • maness300@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I mean, you’re trying to shit on an entire form of art and diminish people’s enjoyment of it.

            There are countless threads on the internet tearing down wrestling and those who like it. Very few actually have responses like the one you’re replying to.

            • aesthelete@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I mean, you’re trying to shit on an entire form of art and diminish people’s enjoyment of it.

              yawn it’s “art” primarily made for people who take daily shits on art being for pussies or pansies or worthless

              I understand that there are some versions of it that don’t suck and that not all of the fans are like that…but this is a situation akin to mainstream country music…the current mainstream incarnations of this thing (i.e. the WWE, which is such an impoverished “artist” that it just inked a multi-billion dollar deal with Netflix) are so far removed from the “art” version of the thing that we might as well be talking about different things.

              As for “diminishing people’s enjoyment of it”…if you cannot enjoy something despite very mild criticisms of it…you probably didn’t enjoy it that much to begin with. This is Lemmy so I don’t think the two dozen views my posts get will make a big cosmic difference.

              Very few actually have responses like the one you’re replying to.

              Doubt

              I come from Twitter. I’m not sure what your social media background is but there they have a “leave no opportunity for sanctimonious bullshit unexplored” policy.

              • maness300@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                primarily made for people who take daily shits on art being for pussies or pansies or worthless

                Okay… have you ever heard of being the bigger person? And this in no way applies to everyone or even the majority of people who enjoy wrestling.

                You sound like a grandpa trying to explain to teenagers why rap isn’t music.

      • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Do the people who go “you know that stuffs fake right?” actually think that there are people who think it’s real?

        • Dadd Volante@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          The best response to that is to pretend like you are just discovering that for the first time.

          Explain how you believed this entire time a man could summon fire with a wave of his hand, or even come back from the dead, and that they have ruined your worldview.

          When you point out how stupid the question is, makes the conversation short.

          • Dadd Volante@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Untrue. Vastly untrue.

            What we know as wrestling started off in civil war camps (between battles, Irish soldiers would wrestle each other while the other soldiers would bet on the matches), which eventually turned into a legitimate sport, who’s first World Champion was a man called William Muldoon. Also known as “the solid man”.

            What we know as professional wrestling today can be traced back to 1909 with a match between Frank Gotch and George Hackenschmidt, which is considered to be the last legitimate contest for a world title under the banner of “professional wrestling”.

            After that we get the rise of the Gold Dust Trio and what we know as “sports entertainment”.

  • Grangle1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    YouTubeTV and Hulu + Live TV already literally stream cable. Can’t get closer to basic cable than that, lol. That said, remains to be seen whether Netflix is one of the services that survives the drastic market correction I think will happen eventually.

  • herrcaptain@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I fundamentally agree with the premise of the article, but did anyone else find it strange how much the writer mentioned the show Suits?

    • deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The thesis from my skim pf the article was just that Netflix is shifting from weird/experimental award bait to the sort of normie stuff you’d see on TNT, USA, or other mainstream/non-niche basic cable.

      With Suits being a quintessential example of such a turn.

    • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Protip: always cancel immediately after subscribing. Only resubscribe if there is something you actually wanna watch. And cancel immediately again. And so on. This way you will never pay for not using it.

    • BadActorLol@talk.macstack.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Just cancelled today after not even using it for a year.

      How can you be so dumb to pay for something you don’t even use? No shit they’re rich af 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

      • 18-24-61-B-17-17-4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Busy life. Demanding job. Tons of different bills so it just blends in. Shit just gets lost in the shuffle sometimes man.

        I watched it a handful of times but not enough to justify keeping it.

  • Tremble@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s easier to find ANY movie or show online than it is to actually take the time to login to netflix