• NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Okay, and? Like them or hate them (jk you should hate them) but they had a state; it wasn’t “a failed state ruled by warlords”.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        No it’s not? A failed state is one in which the state can’t punish a significant amount of non-state sanctioned violence, which wasn’t the case in Afghanistan.

        • FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          I suppose if you use that definition then when America invaded it became a failed state run by warlords and now it has recovered.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yeah exactly. Now, being a non-failed state, they can start the long, gruelling process of cultural and political evolution. That’s why you’re hearing about Afghani human rights activists now but not ten years ago.