Tech bros’ attitude to female colleagues stuck in dark ages::Research sheds light on attitudes holding industry back

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m well aware of biology, thank you.

    It’s an undeniable fact that there are more single mothers who look after their children than single fathers. I’ll leave it to you to figure out why.

    Women working fewer hours in their working lives is by far and away the biggest reason for the gap between the total lifetime earnings of men and total lifetime earnings of women. The biggest reason women take fewer hours is because of pregnancy and childcare. That’s why I brought it up. I thought that was obvious, but apparently not.

    Prove to me that women earn less for doing the same work. Find me a job listing that advertises a lower wage for women. You won’t find one. Because that’s not the issue here.

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Find me a job listing that advertises a lower wage for women. You won’t find one.

      That would be asking for trouble, duh.

      It’s illegal in my country to specify gender too, so all ads say “(m/f)”, do you really think there won’t be a hiring bias when hiring for a role where one gender is predominant?

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course there sometimes is. Where did I say otherwise? What does that have to do with anything I said?

        All I said was that by far far and away the biggest cause of the lifetime earnings gap between men and women being the way that it is is because women work fewer hours in their lives, mainly due to pregnancy and childcare.

        In the UK at least, younger women actually earn more than their male counterparts due to higher university attendance, typically better grades, and ending up in better jobs.

        It’s when they reach an age where it’s typical to take time off to have kids when they fall behind.

        Put simply, work fewer hours = get fewer monies.

        If governments want to close the gap, and I think they should, they need to make childcare more accessible. It helps both men and women, but moreso women, because they’re the ones who take time off for pregnancy, and they’re typically the ones who take more time off for looking after children after that.

        • reliv3@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It feels a but ridiculous that you are using “less work hours due to pregnancy and childcare” as your primary explanation for why women make less over multi-decades long career.

          Women go on pregnancy leave for months. How can this explain less pay for years of working?