SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agoWhat's the worst spelling you've seen?lemmy.dbzer0.comexternal-linkmessage-square194fedilinkarrow-up1823arrow-down17
arrow-up1816arrow-down1external-linkWhat's the worst spelling you've seen?lemmy.dbzer0.comSnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square194fedilink
minus-squareSnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-25 hours agoHow dare you. You dont beat me, Faustus
minus-squareandros_rex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 hours agoI named myself after two scientists, whose work I share with the world regularly 😉
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 hours agoDunning-Kruger, as an example case?
minus-squareandros_rex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 hours agoFunnily enough, I’ve seen some compelling criticism of good old D & K. The original paper by Dunning and Kruger starts with the quote: “It is one of the essential features of incompetence that the person so inflicted is incapable of knowing that they are incompetent.” This idea has spread far and wide through both scientific literature and pop culture alike. But according to the work of my colleagues and me, the reality is that very few people are truly unskilled and unaware. The Dunning and Kruger experiment did find a real effect – most people think they are better than average. But according to my team’s work, that is all Dunning and Kruger showed. The reality is that people have an innate ability to gauge their competence and knowledge. To claim otherwise suggests, incorrectly, that much of the population is hopelessly ignorant.
How dare you. You dont beat me, Faustus
I named myself after two scientists, whose work I share with the world regularly 😉
Dunning-Kruger, as an example case?
Funnily enough, I’ve seen some compelling criticism of good old D & K.