• Diplomjodler@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    You can build a lot of batteries for 35 billion. And those don’t produce waste that you have to store for millennia.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Some modern nuclear reactor models produce less long-term waste than batteries.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh boy, why are these sorts of comments always upvoted by people who obviously don’t know shit?
        First Lithium batteries are often reusable for secondary purposes when they don’t meet original specifications, and then they can be recycled pretty efficiently.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Lmao and what about battery waste when they’re past their lifespan in 15 years?

        Well, if you mean Lithium batteries, you grind up the dead batteries and make new Lithium batteries from that. Its not like lithium is burned up never to be used again with these. Here’s the lithium and cobalt extracted from recycled lithium batteries after all the plastic and other metals are removed:

        You can watch the whole process from dead battery to extracted materials here, if you want.

        But that’s today’s tech. Sodium batteries are quickly taking over for grid scale storage. Sodium you might know as the 7th most abundant element on Earth, so we’re not running out of that any time soon.