The labor market is slowing, but it’s all good news in the White House.

The U.S. added 139,000 jobs in May, a slight decline from April, according to a jobs report released Friday. The unemployment rate remained at 4.2 percent, still within the ballpark of historic lows reached in 2023, when the unemployment rate reached 3.4 percent—the lowest it had been in more than five decades. But within the folds of the report hid a major red flag for Donald Trump’s agenda: The U.S. is still bleeding manufacturing jobs.

But even the president’s favorite conservative network couldn’t hide its dismay at the slight manufacturing downturn.

“Now, 8,000 manufacturing jobs were lost in May. That’s not what you wanted to see,” said Fox Business host Stuart Varney.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Industrial capital spending has never, ever been as low as it is right now, even during Covid. It’s pretty much zero, because nobody has any intention of investing in any sort of industrial infrastructure in a complete clusterfuck of economic and trade policy. The chicken hasn’t come close to roosting yet, give it another few months and watch the bloodbath.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      They also gorged themselves on basically zero percent lending, used it for things along the lines of stock buybacks and now their equipment/supply chain is failing. Low corporate taxes mean there’s no incentive to reinvest, certainly not upping wages.

      Capitalism is a cancer that’s running out of healthy cells.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    A 2021 study by Oxford Economics and the U.S.-China Business Council concluded that the United States lost 245,000 jobs as a result of the Trump tariffs.

    They’re going to study these tariffs and detail how they fucked America and by the time Republicans do something similar nobody will ever, EVER, bring this up again.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Small businesses come and go, but lately I have seen a shit ton of small businesses disappear.

    Every policy makes winners and losers. The current administrations policies are making a lot more losers than winners to enrich themselves. It is pure unfettered corruption.

  • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I know more were lost in June. My company, in a tariff response, is moving US jobs out because none of our global customers want to pay said tariffs, so we’re shrinking our us manufacturer operations and making other sites.

    Edit: the tariffs to import the raw materials to actually make stuff is what costs my employer the most.

    • jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I have been working for and by myself as a machinist for the last 15 years. The first round of steel tariffs hurt a lot, but I was able to pull through just barely. Now, I am losing every contract I’ve got when they expire (which is soon) and as a small fish I have almost no bargaining power on bids for jobs. I am likely going to have to shutter the business and sell all the equipment.

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      1 day ago

      I work at a factory in Canada. We just got a huge contract from European customers and we’ve been told we’re running more machines on 24/7 shifts to meet demand and hiring 50 new staff to do it. The clients switched from producing in the US to avoid costs associated with the trade war.

    • Sabin10@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      1 day ago

      Putting tariffs on raw materials and natural resources you don’t have domestically is possibly the dumbest thing a politician could do.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think in most cases we do technically have them domestically, but we’re rightfully unwilling to strip-mine ourselves and wreck the landscape to extract them. On the other hand, Trump, with his rapist mentality, is perfectly happy to force that to happen, will of the public be damned.

    • thedruid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Companies with warehouses and facilities in multiple countries are all sitting pretty. In fact some are expanding quickly

  • Placebonickname@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    U mean asking manufacturers to pay MORE to produce in America encourages them to move production to other countries? You’re kidding!

    • HorseTesselator@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s worse than that.

      Let’s say I want to open a widget factory in America because of the tariffs. Sure, I can avoid the tariffs on the widgets themselves by making them here, but there’s a big problem…

      What about the tariffs on the materials needed to make them?

      So Trump wants to strong-arm a minerals deal with some country via a protection racket only to… tariff them?

      Jesus Christ.

      Unironically, depending on how the supply chain is arranged for your industry, it may actually be cheaper to move your manufacturing off shore and eat the tariff once instead of getting nickeled and dimed for every single item you need to assemble on shore. Hell, Vietnam already figured out you can ship Chinese products through to America as grey imports and skim off the top.

      It is hard for me to articulate just how fucking stupid all of this is. It’s no small wonder how this guy bankrupted six casinos.

      But hey, Art of the Deal, baby.

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Unironically, depending on how the supply chain is arranged for your industry, it may actually be cheaper to move your manufacturing off shore and eat the tariff once instead of getting nickeled and dimed for every single item you need to assemble on shore.

        And that’s not even accounting for forecasting, which is still necessary in the stupid-frahile JIT approach. Noone will want to sign a long-term supply contract when they could get screwed by sudden tarrifs and the JIT people have to rely on luck to avoid subjecting customers to sticker-price whiplash.

        It’s all just so fucking stupid.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It is hard for me to articulate just how fucking stupid all of this is. It’s no small wonder how this guy bankrupted six casinos.

        I always assumed they were bankrupted on purpose as part of some sort of money laundering scheme, but you’re bringing me around to the idea that it may actually have been sheer stupidity rather than crime.

      • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        24 hours ago

        This is exactly what some of the biggest manufacturers of cars in America are thinking of doing. They manufacture in America but a lot of the parts are imported and would cost them a fortune to import. It’s cheaper to move factories to China, build the full part, and then ship it over because the tarrifs are higher on the individual tech parts inside the assembly than a finished product using those parts.

      • huppakee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I don’t disagree with your point, but except for electronics, and Italian marble America can make a lot of the materials themselves. The biggest problem is in many cases the price of labour in the US. And for complex things like cars you can’t even move the entire supply chain even if you wanted to.

        There was this guy who had a theory that there was nobody on earth who could make a microwave oven, turns out he was right: there are people who can know how to make a certain part of it and other people who knew about it’s assembly nobody can create one start to finish. So imagine with more complex machines how difficult it’d be to bring all those skills and knowledge ‘home’ to America.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I am not sure about other industry, but in the pharmaceutical industry, several companies decided immediately to set up more manufacturing sites in the US after the tariff threat. But I think it is because these companies are producing weight loss drugs, which is selling like hot cakes since last year, so I think they know that the huge sales will offset the manufacturing cost and tariffs. These weight loss drugs are new and the patent rights is good for 15-20 years. Some industries are just lucky they are insulated from the worst of tariff impositions, while others are not so much.

    • EndRedStateSubsidies@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      56
      ·
      1 day ago

      Lol, you entirely misunderstand the issue.

      Americans lack the skills and machining of modern manufacturing. It’s so expensive because they’d have to make buildings and teach skills that are already everywhere in China.

      But sure, laugh like a fucking moron we’re taking behind the world because we don’t take care of workers or infrastructure.

      • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        1 day ago

        Americans with those skills don’t want to work for shit wages. I can show you plenty of electrician/engineer/mechanic job postings for sub 60k if you would like. I’ve spent two decades in mfg environments watching poor business decisions cripple the workforce and push any and all qualified individuals out.

        • lemming741@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          24 hours ago

          They’re so fucking myopic. A $50k per year chemical manufacturing operator is going to fuck up $20k worth of equipment and finished product a year compared to a $65k per year.

          A $100k/yr technician will save your bacon twice a month and make it look easy. The $70k/yr parts changer will misdiagnose away that $30k you ‘saved’ in about 6 months.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Just to clarify, the United States already manufacturers a crap load of stuff. We are number two in the world with only China ahead of us.

      • xylol@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        So asking manufacturers to pay more for parts that we can’t produce here is good so that they can move to other countries?

  • mriguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    Looks like they may need to destroy a few more government agencies that collect and distribute labor statistics. That will solve it.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Anyway so I’ve noticed how the freeways are clear sooner than usual after 5pm. They’re still long, but sooner means less people in the rat race trying to get home from work.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      There was a study or survey or something that showed people are leaving the office earlier than they did before the pandemic, the average being between 3 and 4 pm.

      100% true for me

      • altphoto@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Same here. The pandemic showed me a couple of things very clearly:

        1. humans make a shit tom of noise.
        2. we pollute and change the climate with our pollution.
        3. staying at home gives me freedom to learn and do a whole bunch of other things.
          • altphoto@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Yeah that’s what I really meant. Cars, planes and large machinery. When all that stopped for the couple of years…days sometimes weeks at a time, everything was eerily silent.

            • AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              20 hours ago

              That sounds nice. Where I was at the time was close enough to a baptist church that I couldn’t escape their speakers blaring doomsday baptist sermons and gospel music. All day. Every day. For the entire time that churches weren’t allowed to meet inside.

              • altphoto@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Oh that’s hilarious. We used to live near a Jehovah’s temple or whatever they call it. That literally stopped going house to house for a while.