FishFace

Dividing between providers is not what people would be doing if the resilience of cloud services were as is being memed about.

Doing so is phenomenally expensive.

We mainly had non-summative assignments, so those had names on. Exams were all done by student-number, with a fold-down section where you wrote and signed your name.

In fairness I also didn’t feel like I was reading eyewitness accounts of this kind of thing so maybe it doesn’t actually happen (or almost never, or did in the past but no longer)

Presumably not in California or wherever else there are sensible data protection laws?

I have heard that in America the police sometimes fine people for driving at the speed limit because they’re driving too slowly. It’s an absolute farce.

A law that everyone breaks is a law that the police can choose to prosecute anyone for, for any reason. A law that you can be prosecuted for not breaking means you can’t even escape being targeted.

Sorry, didn’t realise you were a lost cause. Hope you escape.

I don’t believe it’s easier than rsync.

Women always had height requirements, you just started seeing them written down.

Online dating certainly brought some new problems, but most women hate it too so if it doesn’t work for you the old staples of finding a partner through friends, a hobby or at work are still there, as well as specific dating activities.

Or just don’t put your height in your bio and be funny. Those “non negotiable height requirements” turn out to be very negotiable in a lot of cases.

And while we’re at it, why do languages have the audacity to use ANY words different from other languages!

See how this sounds?

It has nothing to do with this though.

If you want to know more, look up Multiple Round Simultaneous Impact

THANK YOU

It’s easier to just refer to “multiple round simultaneous impact” than to try to explain succinctly, especially since I already got the term kinda wrong (time on target is more of an umbrella category/earlier version)

That is not how this concept, time on target, works

The diagram is about normal unpowered shells. They use different amounts of propellant to achieve different projectile speeds

I used to like helping my friends move

It seems like you haven’t seen any evidence of them but still believe they’re here?

New matter being created with extremely low probability fits perfectly with our observations.

On these scales, the accuracy of our observations should reduce our confidence though. It doesn’t make sense to confidently say that, in 200 trillion years there will be no stars, because our observations of the rate of new matter creation (approximately zero) have a margin of error which allows for there to still be some

Was there a known issue there?