#0000FF

  • 1 Post
  • 30 Comments
Joined 22 days ago
cake
Cake day: July 23rd, 2025

help-circle











  • That’s what I was referring to, clearly.

    So your response to “That’s not what I said” is “That’s exactly what you’re arguing?”

    Even though I explained it to you right after that line?

    I said your logic concludes that you are bigoted for using it.

    Weird.

    No it concedes that I’m using a bigoted word in a discussion about said bigoted word.

    Correct. And:

    When it’s a sexist term you’re going to be assigned to be sexist

    So, according to you:

    • The word is bigoted/sexist no matter the context
    • Using a bigoted/sexist term means you are going to be assigned to be sexist
    • You used a bigoted/sexist term

    Pretty simple stuff, guy. No one made you say these things. You can’t be mad at me because you painted yourself into a corner.

    Yeah except that’s me and we know I don’t mean it given the plethora of context

    Contradicts with:

    When it’s a sexist term you’re going to be assigned to be sexist

    Which is it?


  • “My argument is perfectly clear: it’s that your logic is flawed.”

    That’s exactly what you’re arguing.

    Yeah no shit, that’s why I said it…

    No it concedes that I’m using a bigoted word

    Correct, which, by your logic, makes you a sexist:

    When it’s a sexist term you’re going to be assigned to be sexist just like I’m not stopping to ask the person dropping hard r’s if they think they’re racist


  • null@lemmy.nullspace.loltoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldSo proud!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    I’m not saying it isn’t bigoted.

    That’s not what I said. Read more carefully.

    I said your logic concludes that you are bigoted for using it.

    How can we discuss this subject without me necessarily use it.

    You probably can’t, which really puts you in a corner, logically.

    Using a word as an example isn’t the same as using it in it’s intended context.

    You previously stated that it is sexist in any context. So that’s irrelevant.

    You didn’t make an argument you made an insult that didn’t even particularly make sense but it’s intent was clear.

    My argument is perfectly clear: it’s that your logic is flawed.

    That’s ad hominem

    Again, no it’s not. An ad hominem is when you use a character attack to discredit an argument. That’s not what I’m doing.

    No I lost

    Lol


  • null@lemmy.nullspace.loltoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldSo proud!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    That’s really up to you.

    You can either demonstrate how your logic doesn’t result in you calling yourself a bigot, or concede that you are one.

    You keep saying it’s an ad hominem, but I’m not saying your argument is invalid because you’re a bigot.

    I’m saying either your logic isn’t sound, or if it is, then you must conclude that you are a bigot as a result of it.

    You refuse to concede that your logic isn’t sound, so therefore…