Pennomi

Constitutionally, no. But when has the constitution ever stopped Trump?

Tensions rise? I think we call that aggression, not tension.

This is gonna confuse AI training so much.

In comparison yes, it’s easy. In practice it’s far outside the means of the average American. Hell, more than a quarter of all households in the US are living paycheck to paycheck right now. That’s effectively impossible.

It is that hard, I’ve looked. You typically need to rank highly on a skill list AND have a relatively well-paying job offer. And if you think it’s hard interviewing in your own country, it’s far worse interviewing outside of it.

Have you looked into what it takes to get a permanent visa to one of those countries? It’s not easy.

And honestly lightweight neural nets can make for some interesting enemy behavior as well. I’ve seen a couple games using that and wouldn’t be surprised if it caught on in the future.

Legally, it seems it does, at least in the US and EU. I assume China too.

Whether or not it should is a different argument, but copyright is a legal framework, not an ethical one.

I’m done with this conversation now because you’re being willfully ignorant (as expected). One quote talking about characteristics is out of context for this discussion. There is a wealth of other context here that you are intentionally ignoring, specifically the many parts showing that scientists do not all agree with a reductionist definition only considering gametes. Your claim that no other definition makes sense is absolute bullshit in the scientific community and you should be ashamed for pretending it’s the only definition out there.

I know you’re just here for the argument, and I’ve wasted enough time on this already. The “gamete size” simplification is Trumpist propaganda and not based in actual rigorous science.

Actual biologists agree that bodies without sex organs don’t fit into the binary definition

Hormone expression (in addition to gamete size) is also a critical factor that scientists use to define sex

Determining “organization” in cases of “physical anomaly” via chromosomes is unreliable

1.3% of people are born intersex, and “intersex” represents an entire continuum

Educate yourself.

That’s not true, there are definitely people both without any sex organs whose body “organization” has no concept of producing any gametes. There are people who are able to produce both gametes. Sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting LALALA does not make these people magically disappear. You cannot argue “well part of their body organization is invalid because of reasons”.

This is classic Dunning-Kruger shit where just because you learned a little about gametes you think you’re an expert, but there’s a huge world of exceptions out there.

That’s a ridiculous definition conjured up by people trying to claim there’s only two sexes. It has effectively no practical use considering gametes on their own are useless for reproduction without an entire system of hardware surrounding them. Plus it guarantees at least three sexes - people who don’t produce gametes at all.

Rings don’t mean shit. This is nothing more than tabloid garbage.

Humans are primarily visual creatures, so we can detect the slop in AI images a LOT faster than we can in audio.

Human artists are going to have to get a lot weirder to out-innovate AI music, and I’m actually happy about that. Weird music is the best.

It’s shocking how little it takes to get Trump on your side. He basically only remembers the last person he talked with.

Kick his ass in Fortnite, obviously.

If they leave immediately in shame like they just did, then yeah, leave them alone. FFS you guys have no concept of diplomacy.

Generally unwise to escalate on stupidity. Don’t give the US any more reasons to double down on war.

Likewise, Congress has the power to release them without Trump by reading them into the record.

Fair enough! I’m always happy to be corrected.