• Pennomi@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Well yeah, and if more people did that we wouldn’t be dealing with nearly as many problems as we currently are.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Short term, sure.

      But it would be exactly like Biden’s four years. Nothing gets fixed, lots of horrible shit still happens, and four years later we’re still choosing between a douche and a turd sandwich.

      If Kamala would have won, she’d have named the DNC chair, and she’d have named another neoliberal with no interest in giving voters what they want.

      It obviously would have been better if elderly neoliberals had just stepped aside for any subsequent generation, but you know that never was going to happen.

      So long term, Kamala losing might be for the best because it gave us the chance to fix the party. Just like long term it probably would have been best for Biden to have lost and trump to have been prez back to back instead of kicking the can down the road which only normalized it

      • Salvo@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        There won’t be a long term.

        Anyone claiming that Biden was senile needs to look at the current incumbent. Anyone claiming that Harris was overly emotional, needs to look at the current incumbent.

        The only way out of this is to completely destroy the GOP, just like we have completely destroyed the Australian Coalition last month… Only then can things be turned around.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Anyone claiming that Biden was senile needs to look at the current incumbent

          Hot take:

          Two elderly racists can both be simultaneously senile.

          In fact recent events would point to large amounts of people like that in America.

          That doesn’t mean we got to pick one to be president

          • Pennomi@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 minutes ago

            It does actually. The system is rigged to only allow two viable candidates. Anyone who says otherwise is either a conman or just foolish. You must pick one, or the rest of the country will pick for you, and you will get nothing.

            There are rare situations when a party breaks up, allowing the other party to win, but those are increasingly uncommon, because everyone knows how it will end up.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Nothing gets fixed,

        You can’t be simultaneously mad at Trump for reversing Biden’s work and claim that Biden fixed nothing. Biden wasn’t perfect but he was doing good things.

    • sad_detective_man@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 hours ago

      “oops sowwy. we were only going to reform the party if we win. looks like we gotta stay late-stage capitalists and keep benefiting from fascists existing. dang”

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Martin just ran out two members of the Rules and Bylaws committee…

    Two neoliberal superdelegates who were literally and figuratively the problem with the party.

    Ironically enough, the voting members of the DNC wouldn’t have had the chance to make this pivot to the left if more people had held their nose for Kamala.

    When a Dem becomes president, they pick the DNC chair and a vote is performative. If Kamala had won, the party would have stayed in the hands of neoliberals and they’d keep running sham primaries…

    Which brings me full circle to Martin running Saunders and Weingarten out of the party, they were on the committee that sets rules for primaries.

    So the Dem party is being fixed, it’s just billionaires own the media and they’d rather Republicans win if a progressive makes it to the general. So there’s a push to get people disengaged from the party, if that allows a neoliberals to win the primary, the media will suddenly stop talking shit about the Dem party again.

  • Guidy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Unfortunately too many people decided she didn’t hate Israel enough and sat out the election. And the democrats aren’t changing either way.

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      well, she did win the election….
      https://www.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/
      and it’s not based on gut feelings… it’s based on hard data… statistically impossible things….
      it’s hard to communicate the stats but we have things like:
      a county where 3 people voted for harris, and 900 people voted for trump, but then democrat on every other option… where historically it had been mostly democrats…
      trump actually said directly they rigged the election, multiple times. Musk said he basically stole it and even said how the election would’ve went had he not… and his numbers checked out.
      the polling data isn’t public everywhere yet, but it was a widespread hack of voting machines, just about everywhere they’ve analyzed.
      ….
      there is overwhelming evidence at this point, but it’s hard to communicate because of all the bullshit trump said about biden stealing the election….
      of course, their election “audits” were how they prepared for stealing this one…
      it didn’t make much news, but they obtained the source code for the voting machines… to audit….

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Which entertaining that Harris was as bad as Trump on Israel/Gaza policy (she wasn’t), every person who sat out objectively said, “I also don’t care about Russia’s genocide in Ukraine, Women’s bodily autonomy, climate change, vaccination policy, or LGBTQ+ rights.”

      Suckers fell for the bullshit.

      • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        6 hours ago

        In a winner-take-all election, anything but a vote for the runner-up is an endorsement of whoever wins.

        Yes, this system is stupid. But we’re not going to ever fix it by pretending that the rules of the game aren’t what they are. Any eligible voter who didn’t vote for Trump or Harris make a clear statement that Donald and protect 2025 were just fine by them. Regardless if they stayed home, voted for a vanity campaign, or just left the POTUS choice blank.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’ve seen polls showing that many progressives voted and many right-leaning democrats didn’t so I think the answer is to lean harder right to capture those votes.

        • TheFogan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Biggest flaw IMO is it seems like they just are going with a binary “left – right”. rather than specific issues as well.

          IE, when the democratic party “leans right”, they adopt, cut taxes on corporations, they basically give the right their narratives.

          IE Republicans on immigration:

          There’s millions of murderous drug cartel pet eating monsters in this country wrecking everything, we need to get them all out of here by any means necessary.

          Dems response: We should absolutely get them out of here, but it’s worth it to do it slowly and keep due process.

          The obvious problem being to the uneducated voter they hear “The parties agree, there are lots of horrible murderers here, do I care more about the rights of the murderers, or getting them out before there are victims”.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      There’s a lot of space between hating Israel and being Israel’s lapdog. Kamala didn’t use any of it.

      They aren’t changing because they don’t need to. The job is already done, their public was successfully manipulated into blaming anyone but the actual people that are in charge of rhe party and the platform itself. Enabling and scapegoating does not lead to change.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      That wasn’t the only issue…

      For example, she became pro border wall and pro fracking.

      Other stuff too, in virtually every aspect she intentionally set her policy positions to the right of the Dem voting base to court the mythical “moderate Republicans” who stopped calling themselves Republicans decades ago.

      Kamala losing was the result of the “who else will the left vote for, if not me”.

      And like normally happens, the answer was “no one”.

      We know how it works out because it keeps being the only choice, and Dems keep losing.

    • Stillwater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago
      1. Kamala was picked without the people’s input, which is bad

      2. This comic trivializes Trump’s authoritarianism by equating the two, which is bad