Naw.
Naw.
People downvoting this are dumb. It’s objectively funny. I know that’s not what that means and I still stand by it.
Lighten up, Francis.
Makes sense. I approached it of less than an article and more of a list of definitions. But yeah, the definitions weren’t good and I found myself wishing for better explanations.
I’m pretty ignorant on all of the definitions though, so I did bookmark it to peruse again later.
Explains the downvotes though, thank you.
Curious why this was downvoted so much
I didn’t laugh because it isn’t funny. I’m still a nerd tho.
Does anyone know what kind of naming pattern or bot identification methods we could use? I belong to a small public server that’s there to serve a public need.
It’s a super close second
Old guy who has played every Zelda game there is. Breath of the Wild wins.
I less the labeling system sucks, which it does. Also the rules. There’s no innovation and every damn feature of outlook should be basically available and EASY to use in gmail and any other mail client. The shit has been around forever and the lack of advanced options is just astounding. I’m simply disappointed.
Ah yes, google nerfing its own services under another browser for its own gain definitely isn’t the issue here.
Nah, Reddit source. Wait 5 seconds.
Binders full of reporters.