• corus_kt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I work at a small company - absolutely everything from work macros, accounts and shortcuts are all intertwined in Chrome, they’ve been using it like that for ten years - it’d be faster for me to find a new job then to unclog that mess from the entire office. I still installed firefox for personal use though.

      • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        11 months ago

        in my previous job we were allowed to install some old version of firefox through the companys own portal. but we couldn’t access internet with it because “firefox is vulnerable”. they use google suite so chrome was the default browser, but edge worked too and even IE…

        • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Most companies now are being shepherded into Microsoft 365’s walled garden by their security teams. Edge is the only “secure” browser now, Teams the only “secure” chat app, Microsoft Authenticator (specifically Microsoft’s app, not DUO or anything else) is the only “secure” way to implement MFA, etc.

          It’s genuinely sad how many security professionals have been shanghaied into Microsoft salesmen.

          • mb_@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            10 months ago

            By secure they mean “the only way we can easily see everything you do”

          • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            We had IT people in at our shop to migrate us over to 365. They wanted me to install Microsoft Authenticator on my personal phone, so I said no. They were able to bypass MFA to sign me up.

            I asked them what would happen if someone didn’t own a smartphone (crazy I know), they had no answer for me. They basically just looked at me like I asked them the square root of pi.

            • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              That’s actually a problem where I work. There are people who carry a flip phone because they don’t want a smart phone. IT gives them a hard token for 2FA.

      • Cheers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I was in the same boat. Selenium with gecko driver was a pretty simple swap, just needed to Ctrl f replace a few things.

    • rizoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I keep going back and forth with Firefox and Vivaldi. The chrome based browsers just tend to run better. I love firefox on mobile but on desktop it’s tougher for me to stick with. Also Mozilla seems to have a different goal for the future with all the other products and ai weirdness they recently announced.

        • rizoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          This is true. Which is why Mozilla needs to focus on making a better browser instead of adding their own ai bullshit.

          • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            11 months ago

            Mozilla has frequently pointed their efforts into the wrong direction. We need to politely encourage them to focus on the things that matter.

      • I’m in the exact same boat. Vivaldi devs are so open about everything they do that they’ve honestly earned my trust in their browser.

        No nonsense and very clear options to disable data collection despite being a chromium based browser. I love firefox mobile’s extensions but it just doesn’t have the same consistency between desktop and mobile. For example, Vivaldi mobile let’s you control site permissions to the level of controlling if they’re allowed to play sound or not

    • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      I once commented saying something like, except for work, all Linux users should be using Firefox. And this was the reply. Some people are just fucking hopeless:

      "Firefox has only ever been a sometime back-up browser for me…ever since Chrome appeared in 2007. Prior to that, I used it because it was the sole usable alternative to Internet Exploder…

      The Mozilla devs, for far too long, spent more time stabbing each other in the back than they did writing code and fixing the tons of problems that were always inherent in the code. It’s the only browser I’ve ever used that used to regularly crash & burn at least a dozen times a day. And ya wonder why people flocked to Chrome?"

    • Lodra@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Serious question. Is it actually better for the typical user? I don’t mean people commenting here. I’m thinking about the majority that don’t care about privacy, blocking ads, quality technology, etc. for those people, I’m guessing that Firefox is equivalent. Just another browser that works fine. So why switch??

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I run into compatibility issues and weird bugs with firefox a lot. I’m still using it as my primary browser, but I have to keep a chromium based browser ready for times when a website won’t work in firefox. I can put up with that personally, but I wouldn’t want to set up firefox on family/friend computers because I don’t want to get a call whenever something doesn’t work and they don’t know why.

        Chrome based browsers also have some super useful features (like tab groups) that firefox doesn’t have a good alternative for.

        • Lodra@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          Interesting. I’ve heard this many times from people here on Lemmy. I’ve been running Firefox for ~6 months now (previously Brave) and haven’t seen these issues yet. I don’t even have a chromium based browser available on any of my devices.

          Regardless, I hear you about not wanting to be personal support for friends and family. That’s annoying

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            People inevitably bring up compatibility issues in Firefox when this subject comes up, and nobody ever has specific examples.

            • Spaz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Proxmox virtual machine server, v8.x the UI is funky and the console doesn’t display properly.

        • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          I run into compatibility issues and weird bugs with firefox a lot. I’m still using it as my primary browser, but I have to keep a chromium based browser ready for times when a website won’t work in firefox…

          Got any specific examples you don’t mind sharing? I can’t remember the last time I ran into this.

          • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Most recent one was visiting https://www.lifetime.com/playsets on Firefox mobile. After going back and forth between the list of playsets and individual playset pages, Firefox stopped loading the list of playsets. I would load in most of the page, but the actual product list wouldn’t load. Refreshing and restarting Firefox wouldn’t fix it, but the page loaded fine in brave browser so it didn’t appear to be a server issue.

            Before that one, I had a time where Firefox mobile was completely broken by an update for like a week. Wouldn’t load any web pages, reinstalling/resetting user data/etc wouldn’t fix it.

            I’ve had websites break on Firefox desktop too, but I don’t have any specific examples I can recall right now. I definitely run into more issues with Firefox mobile than desktop though.

            • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I definitely run into more issues with Firefox mobile than desktop though.

              Ah, mobile. I don’t use Firefox mobile due to its insecure status, particularly lack of sandboxing:

              Avoid Gecko-based browsers like Firefox as they’re currently much more vulnerable to exploitation and inherently add a huge amount of attack surface. Gecko doesn’t have a WebView implementation (GeckoView is not a WebView implementation), so it has to be used alongside the Chromium-based WebView rather than instead of Chromium, which means having the remote attack surface of two separate browser engines instead of only one. Firefox / Gecko also bypass or cripple a fair bit of the upstream and GrapheneOS hardening work for apps. Worst of all, Firefox does not have internal sandboxing on Android. This is despite the fact that Chromium semantic sandbox layer on Android is implemented via the OS isolatedProcess feature, which is a very easy to use boolean property for app service processes to provide strong isolation with only the ability to communicate with the app running them via the standard service API. Even in the desktop version, Firefox’s sandbox is still substantially weaker (especially on Linux) and lacks full support for isolating sites from each other rather than only containing content as a whole. The sandbox has been gradually improving on the desktop but it isn’t happening for their Android browser yet.

              Source: https://grapheneos.org/usage#web-browsing

        • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          This was the case back when Chrome was starting out too. Everything was made for IE and you’d have to keep it around for the odd time you needed it.

          Eventually those old sites were replaced and now Chrome is the new de facto standard.

      • diffcalculus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        For the overwhelming majority of users, they won’t know the difference between using the two. People here are on a high inhaling the air in this echo chamber.

        I’ve used Chrome on every device imaginable since Chrome was a thing. I’ve had a negligible amount of problems, in all my years. I absolutely hate that Google shuts services down when they get bored. And I absolutely hate what they did with Google Music and Google Chats, and Domains.

        I move off Google services when they shut down. Besides that, I’ve no problems with the ones I use (minus nitpicks and the above products).

        So to anyone here feeling bad and are afraid to comment on here because they don’t want to lose Internet points, fret not. There are millions of us perfectly satisfied using Google, PAYING for their services where we see fit, and generally not worrying at all about any of this.

        • anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          What about the ad blocker changes they’re making? That’s pretty much the line for me. I use chrome everywhere but when ublock stops working well that’ll be me jumping ship. The web is a fucking unreadable cesspool without a solid adblocker running.

          • diffcalculus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            The adblock changes is a shit stain, absolutely agree with you there.

            For my household, personally, it won’t make a difference because I have a pihole blocking everything from all devices. So that change isn’t enough to persuade me to make a move.

            But yes, anyone who doesn’t have pihole of and uses adblockers, it will be 100% understandable for them to jump ship.

    • Allah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      some small problems i face is that

      while i use youtube it runs slower.

      and the quick image search feature using google lens is not present.

      and telegram voice call does not work.

      • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Where as,
        youtube = googlie
        google lens = googlie
        and
        telegram via web requires chromium api, so = googlie

        Hmm, proprietary things that are totally under the control of the corpo in question run slower or not at all on the corpo’s competitor’s browser. I wonder if that isn’t exactly what avoid a monoculture is all about preventing?

      • themachine@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Ah yes, google nerfing its own services under another browser for its own gain definitely isn’t the issue here.

      • DePietPiraat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You can use a different frontend for YouTube. You’ve got Freetube for pc, Yattee for MacOS and iOS and piped on any platform. These solutions also protect your privacy and block ads.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          If only they actually worked. Never understand how they get recommended constantly and yet repeatedly I try to use them and they don’t work.

        • Wannade@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          My problem with these is that the quality is always bad. Usually 720p max and only H.264 instead of VP9. YouTube quality is already bad enough as it is and nerfing it even more feels awful.

      • w2tpmf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s because YouTube detects the browser you are using, and slows it down for browsers that aren’t their own.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        and the quick image search feature using google lens is not present

        There’s an addon that not only adds that back into the right click menu but also adds support for other image searching services!

        Its called “search by image” and it works very well ime

    • leaskovski@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      To be fair, chromebooks are great devices for kids, and the family link platform makes keeping them “secure”, easier… a lot easier!!!

        • leaskovski@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It grinds me a bit, as I did have a Linux version if Firefox installed on my Chromebook, but because the book is just a sofa device and doesn’t get any love (especially from the little shits), it runs dog slow, so I end up just using chrome on it, and suffer the pain of not having things synced between devices. Thankfully the most important thing, bitwarden is syncing, so I can manage the suffering.

    • nadram@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Chrome is great at multi-user switching. FF in comparison is @$$ in that respect… I went back to FF around a month ago after a decade long hiatus.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Some websites load faster in Chrome. But the reason why Chrome is so ubiquitous is because for normal people, Google is still the plucky user friendly company they were in the early 00s.

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Firefox is better on desktop, but on mobile it still sucks, sometimes it is even refusing to load websites.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because normies were using IE, then enough of them had their “tech enthusiast” grandson show them Chrome in 2010 and now that’s all they use.

    • people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      No lie, I actually had to shift to Chrome from Firefox today. Some websites are straight-up broken on Firefox, while others load painfully slow (e.g. try arc.net on Firefox vs any Chromium-based browser). Not to mention the massive shame of Mozilla leadership treating its own flagship product as a second-class citizen in favour of “AI initiatives” or whatever the fuck those C-suites want to stud into their resumes.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Firefox is right there and is a better browser to boot. I genuinely have no idea why

      I used to use mozilla by Mozilla, too. THAT’s why.

    • Obinice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Okay I’m happy to switch, I used to use Firefox years ago until Chrome came along and it’s a great browser, but can I integrate my Google accounts with it?

      I want it to sync all my stuff to my Google accounts, and so far I’ve not found another browser that can do this :-(

      I’m also not sure if all the plugins I have would have Firefox implementations, maybe they do. I use Darkreader, some password vault stuff, uBlock, SponsorBlock and the other YouTube one they make (I forget the name) are an absolute must, too.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        What do you want to integrate with your Google account? Imo that’s something to specifically avoid, not something to seek out. But I may be not understanding what you mean

        • Obinice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          All my bookmarks, search history, browsing history (so I can type a portion of a URL into my address bar, say a word or so, and have it find the page I want even though my own memory fails me), that sort of thing. Plus it works across all my devices.

          And casting pages or my desktop or such to my Chromecast is really handy too, and so is the Chrome Remote Desktop feature that I use sometimes to remote in to my PC. I don’t know how many of those things Firefox has, maybe it casts and stuff too.

          But yeah I use all that kinda stuff, and of course it keeps me logged in to all the Google services I use, like my emails, YouTube, Drive, Docs, Maps, etc, and facilitates using that stuff seamlessly without issues, which is great.

          I’m deep in the Google ecosystem basically, and I’d be happy to switch browsers just so long as that deep functionality remained, know what I mean?

          Some people here really hate Google (like, specifically on Lemmy people seem unusually angry about them existing), but they seem no worse (or better) than any of the other companies that offer all this stuff, so I might as well pick my poison as it were. They’re all evil at the end of the day, haha.

          Sure, I could run 20 different individual open source services on a server to do everything I use Google for, albeit without integrations and likely a bit more muddled and less feature complete, requiring ongoing care and upkeep, and that IS kinda appealing, I do get why, I used to do the homelab/home-sysadmin stuff for fun, but I just don’t have the time or patience to do that stuff these days, you know?

          I got older, and now I just want a functioning service that I don’t need to fiddle around with these days, and that way of life extends to my browser too. Give me a good browser that lets me do what I want with all the integrations I like, and I’m happy.

          Right now I’m not happy with Chrome because of their ad blocker policy, and how locked down plugins are in general. And I want to theme it! Firefox used to let you change everything in a themed all the colours, icons, element sizes and so on, it was dope. I assume they still do that, I’d love that.

          Anyway, I hope that answers your question :-) Sorry if it is a bit muddled, I blame ADHD brain :-P

          • Klear@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Damn, no replies. I’m in the same boat. I’m kinda waiting for Google to break adblock so I finally have the push to make the switch.

      • CatTrickery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Firefox has Firefox Accounts which will do just the same. All those extensions are also available. You may find the odd extension is missing but there is usually a decent replacement about.

      • Johanno@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        All work on Firefox.

        While you can’t use Google password-manager easily on Firefox (probably there is a plugin for that) the Firefox password-manager is better in my opinion.

        The Google account stuff works mostly, but I don’t know what you exactly want to do. You should try it out.

    • Jako301@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Firefox is not the better browser in anything but privacy. Maybe it could win in customisability, but that’s something only a few percent of users care about.

      It has longer load times and sometimes breaks sites entirely while using about the same resources. Yes, the reason for that is that website creators don’t deliberately support it, but the normal user only cares about functionality.

      I still use it and recommend it to anyone that asks, but saying that it’s the better browser is just delusional.

    • anlumo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Chrome’s developer tools are better, and having two browsers open at the same time while programming is a strain on RAM resources, especially since Visual Studio Code needs to run in its own Chromium.

      • not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Have you checked recently? Chrome devtools have been getting steadily worse the last few years, and Firefox’s keeps getting better.

        • anlumo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          I haven’t seen anything getting worse, but I agree that the Firefox dev tools are now barely usable. They weren’t before.

            • webhead@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I honestly have no idea what this guy is talking about. I use dev tools in Firefox all the time and they’re pretty much the same as Chrome.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Right, they’re great. They were a little janky in 2012 and before or something but yeah Chrome only enjoyed maybe 1-2 years even back then of being better

        • Daniel F.@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Idk, twenty twenty-something. But Chromium with the YouTube homepage takes less RAM than GNOME Software and GNOME Shell, which either says I should move to Xfce or that Chromium has improved. Can’t speak on VS Code though since I run that in a distrobox and podman is broken for me rn.

        • anlumo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          The year where a browser can easily eat up 10GB of RAM.

          On my Mac mini with 8GB, just having Visual Studio Code open is enough to fill up the RAM. No other programs necessary.

            • anlumo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              I just use it for building and deploying to macOS/iOS. I don’t want to spend four digit prices just for that (I’m a freelancer).

            • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              A lot of more budget devices still have 4 and 8 gigs. Not to mention all the older devices.

                • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Genuine question (I am not a developer): if you don’t use a bloated IDE, what do you need this much RAM for?

              • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Your WORKstation is for working. Budget devices are not for working.

            • anlumo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              The new MacBook Pro Apple just released a few days ago comes with 8GB in the lower two tiers.

          • locuester@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s 2024. 32GB is a min requirement. I roll with 128GB because it’s a couple hundred bucks to never have to worry about RAM.

  • ExLisper@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    145
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    “But Chrome is slightly more convenient! Why would I suffer tiny inconvenience today in order to save me from way greater inconvenience later? Who am I? Some reasonable person?” - typical Chrome user.

    • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      As a former chrome user it’s so real. Chrome connects every device for you and once you ARE in the loop it’s hard to leave it. Wanna switch to Firefox? Oops suddenly your authentication doesn’t work anymore. Oh what about those useful Google logins tied to everything now? Good luck with that.

      It took me huge effort to switch off chromium based browsers because the longer you use chrome, the more it worms it’s way into all your services making it harder and harder to switch. I still can’t figure out how to seperate my Yahoo account from my Gmail account

      A huge reason I left is realising that if google decided I broke their TOS on something like say, YouTube ad blocking, they can just terminate by Google account and every service attached to it suddenly becomes unusable. I’d rather not be taken hostage like that

      Edit: for all the wise people in the comments. I was trying to decouple entirely from Google products, not just chrome

      • ExLisper@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        11 months ago

        What you’re describing sounds more like over-reliance on Google services than the browser. I don’t use gmail or google logins anywhere, I just have Bitwarder plugin to manage my authentication and use masked emails to create accounts. I did the same in all the different browsers I used over the years and never had any issues with it or with switching between browsers.

        • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          You’re right, but that’s still a valid concern. Many people are much more ingrained in the Google ecosystem, especially through Android.

          We’re seeing this issue with Microsoft in the buisness space, too.

          And if course we’ve been seeing it with Apple for decades.

          These massive corporations have a great deal of people so ingrained in their interconnected services, it’s next to impossible to convince them to extract themselves.

          This is why the EU regulations focus on “gatekeepers”. Because users will not make the necessary changes in their habits to combat the abhorrent practices in the industry. There is no true free market here. So the solution is to regulate the shit out of these gatekeepers to make them open up and play fair.

          • ExLisper@linux.community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            IMHO unfortunately most people will always go for what’s more convenient, don’t care about their privacy and don’t mind ads and there’s not much we can do about it. Eventually all the content on the web will be locked up behind a paywall and/or accompanied by nu-blockable ads. Most users won’t mind that. We’ll be left with what we can host/support ourselves like lemmy or mastodon.

      • hersh@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        11 months ago

        Firefox syncs across devices as well, if you sign up for a Firefox account and enable sync. This works for bookmarks, logins, history, and you can even access remote tabs if you want. It’s also easy to send a single page from one device to another.

        On desktop, Firefox has an import feature that will pull your bookmarks and logins m other browsers (like Chrome) into your Firefox profile.

        Even if you’re neck-deep in Google services, Chrome doesn’t do anything special.

        • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Yeee I’m using Firefox. It’s just difficult to desynch the Google services with all my accounts tied to it I had to one by one change em or even make new accounts entirely.

          The worst is the fucking Google authentication app and how it’s tied into stuff like Discord…At least I’m out of the Google ouroboros now but it was still intensely painful.

          • hersh@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I don’t understand the problem. Google services work in Firefox pretty much the same way, yeah? Does Chrome integrate an authenticator app? If som you might want change your 2FA settings at https://myaccount.google.com/security . If you have an Android phone you can get push notifications on it, or you can also use third-party authenticator apps.

              • hersh@literature.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                Oh, gotcha. I misunderstood and thought you were describing a Chrome-vs-Firefox difference specifically. Yeah, I can relate. I’m de-googling my life but I’m not sure I’ll ever be 100% de-googled. I’m taking it bit by bit. I sign up for new things with different email addresses now and occasionally I’ll change existing services if it’s possible. But there’s no way I’m going to go through my bajillion web site accounts and move them all.

          • Zak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            the fucking Google authentication app and how it’s tied into stuff like Discord

            The one that implements the open standard TOTP that has a bunch of open source implementations?

            • Aceticon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Now I’m really happy that all the way back in the late 90s I learned as a software professional that depending on a 3rd party for anything essential is highly likely to eventually come around and bit you.

              So when the whole Single Sign-On (via Google, Facebook and so on) bollocks started becoming fashionable over a decade ago I just saw it as a single-point-of-failure dependency on a provider and avoided it.

              Ditto with Gmail - I’ve been renting my own domain with e-mail service included for almost two decades exactly because my ultimate dependency on that service is a national DNS Registar (not even the provider as I can just move over my domain and e-mail archive to another one) which can’t just turn around and screw customers because they’re the very same one on which massive companies depend for the proper working of everything linked to the domain names (thinks banks depending on them for customers reaching their website and e-mailing them).

              I highly recommend the practice on thinking “how critical is this for me” and “what would happen if these people went bankrupt or changed their minds” when you’re considering getting into a situation were there is a continuous dependency on some external 3rd party provider (this is also why Software As A Service can be a really bad idea versus just buying the bloody software if you’re using it regularly and data that you might need for years is stuck in their system with no chance of exporting it).

              Absolutelly: need to use something once or twice, it’s fine, but for everyday life or as a requirement for your business operations, depending on an external actor from which you can’t easilly switch and who doesn’t have some kind of iron-clad tight legal contract with you that includes stiff monetary penalties for non compliance (and, even then, they might just go bankrupt) is a pretty risky choice.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Even if you’re neck-deep in Google services, Chrome doesn’t do anything special.

          Actually, being able to cast to other devices is very easy to do with Chrome, but extremely hard to impossible to do with Firefox, unfortunately.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Chrome connects every device for you

        What? Besides debugging things on mobile devices, I’ve never sought to connect any device to chrome. Btw this exact same process works in FF too. You’re talking about chrome like it’s an operating system.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        For me it was as easy as download > export bookmarks and passwords. Nothing broke. I even still use my google account to login to some services. It just brings up the google popup and I’m in.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        what about those useful Google logins tied to everything now? Good luck with that.

        What? You can still use your Google account without Chrome…

        Unless you’re not talking about OAuth. Is it Chrome’s password manager? Because I’m pretty sure that’s easily exportable…

      • Joelk111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I didn’t have this experience at all. I switch browsers all the time just so I can know how they are, it’s painless every time. I’ve used non-chromium edge, chromium Edge, Brave, Chrome, Firefox, OperaGX, and probably something else. Chrome is probably my least favorite, as it just doesn’t have any bells and whistles.

        • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Oh I was way deeper than just browser

          I unfortunately had an account, my entire phone linked to it, my Microsoft account linked to it and even my authenticator app linked to it which was responsible for 2FA on most of my non Google accounts.

          It was all interlinked in a way that made removing it from the root hard

          • Joelk111@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I can’t say I relate to that at all. I’m not sure what you mean by having your MS account linked to chrome, and stuff like my authenticator is on my phone, I didn’t even know you could use chrome as an authenticator.

    • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      11 months ago

      We can’t forget that a lot of people have absolutely no idea that this is happening or what it means. Many folks just think the Chrome icon is how you access the internet and have no idea that there are other options. Helping to educate those folks is going to be a significant part of minimizing Chrome’s dominance.

  • shrugal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’ve been removing Google services from my life bit by bit over the past year, and I have to say it is crazy how hard it actually is! They have inserted themselves into so many digital workflows, securing monopoly positions and preventing the rise of competitors and open ecosystems. In many areas the only alternatives are other tech giants, or accepting feature downgrades and having to set things up manually.

    I’m really glad that the browser is one area where the transition is actually very simple and straightforward!

  • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yeah, I’ll never use Chrome again. Google has always been shady, but this latest round of anti-features is unbelievable. I’m shocked there’s been no anti-trust suits related to what they’re doing with Chrome. Firefox is just a better browser with way more security options and extension support. That alone is enough for me to stick with it.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    11 months ago

    If Firefox goes away, I’ll use Epiphany or Konquerer before I subject myself to anything that makes me view ads.

  • thejodie@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’ve used Firefox for years. It’s always been the underdog imo.

    If it ever becomes the top dog, I’ll switch! To the next privacy underdog. More competition is good.

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’ve read so many bs paid-off articles recently how chrome is so much better than firefox, or firefox has nothing left to give to its users

  • Resonosity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Made the switch to Firefox last year. Love, love, love the freshness and versatility of the browser! Also add-ons for mobile!!!

  • zingo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Well of course. Now all your traffic goes through proxies to Google’s servers for analytics.

    100℅ data harvesting.

    Genius move by Google. Even calls it a security/privacy measure!

    They will succeed too. Most of the human race are Neanderthals anyway. Couldn’t care less.

  • thezeesystem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Lots of people can’t just straight up ditch it. I have had multiple websites just don’t work with Firefox regardless of whatever add-ons I put. For me I just go into a Windows sandbox, but there’s people who are not that tech savvy and it’s often forced on them. Also iirc most schools have chrome books they let students use. So it’s basically forced onto people.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Do you have any examples? I have used Firefox for years and never experienced this, nor heard of anyone I know who uses Firefox experiencing this.

      • Swagicus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not the commenter, but…

        I play tabletop RPGs (Pathfinder 2e for those care) online with some friends, and we use a website which hosts the program (forge-vtt.com).

        For the life of me, I cannot get it to behave on Firefox. Maps will be pitch black while on Chrome they render perfectly. I’ve tried every permutation of browser setting and extension toggling I can think of to no avail.

      • thesystemisdown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’ve hit the odd site where a menu doesn’t work the way it should, the payment form doesn’t work, overall form validation is wonky, or the captcha doesn’t work. I attribute most of these to slight nuances in javascript between browsers.

        I’m a (old, grey) dev, and I’ve had to shame colleagues into testing in mobile browsers other than Chrome and Safari.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Sonys website immediately comes to mind

        Trying to get my account back for my PS5 forced me to use edge for it to work at all

        And then to use edge on my wife’s PC because something I have installed REALLY pisses Sony off

      • Poiar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Oftentimes, when I use Firefox (Main browser on my phone) things just don’t render/show up. One thing I noticed was when I input my area code to find a package distribution center, and it straight up didn’t show. Iirc it relied on Google maps for showing these places.

        It worked in Chrome. Not pointing any fingers, it’s just odd, is what I’m saying.

      • Billygoat@catata.fish
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I use Firefox except for one thing: web serial. Chrome is the only browser that supports it. Luckily you only need it the when setting up an ESP32 for the first time and can do updates wirelessly.

      • ItCantBeThatEasy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Today there was a page on my bank that just would not load in Firefox even though the rest of the site was fine. Switched to Chrome and it worked fine. I only use Chrome in these situations.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      If a website or app doesn’t test in Firefox, I avoid it. That’s something I run into like once a year, and I just use edge once if I need to, and avoid that website or app in the future. It’s not hard to support Firefox, it’s just a shitty ass business decision not to

    • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Use a Chromium fork instead if you’re having so much trouble. Thorium is a decent alternative.

    • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I have had multiple websites just don’t work with Firefox regardless of whatever add-ons I put.

      The exact reason why we encurage to ditch Chrome.

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I have had multiple websites just don’t work with Firefox regardless of whatever add-ons I put.

      Have you tried to change the browser’s user agent ?

  • spudwart@spudwart.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    We really need more browser engines floating around.

    As of now we really only have 3, Webkit, Firefox Gecko, and Chromium Blink.

    Everything is based on these 3. And I know, technically chromium and firefox are both based on webkit, but they’re so far gone from webkit they function as their own engines.

    • kib48@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      tbh i think it would be better if there was a single collaborative engine instead, owned by a non-profit company like The Linux Foundation

      maybe the W3C could establish their own but idk if they even do anything these days

      • piecat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        11 months ago

        Embrace extend extinguish

        It’s almost already too late at this point

        • mob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Not going to lie, I really hate when the internet gets a new favorite phrase. Destroys discussion on the subjects and feels like it’s a race for commenters to say the hit phrase.

          • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            Lemmy is chock full of stupid people on the right team for the wrong reasons. They treat switching to Linux and FF the same way someone would declare they gave their life to Jesus Christ.

            Most of them can’t even explain why something is good or bad without resorting to the catch phrase of the day. “Enshittification”, “EEE”, “Chrome bad cuz capitalism or something, gib updoots.”

        • phillaholic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s not. In the late 90s it was pretty much just IE after Netscape died. Mozilla came from the ashes.