Maybe he wouldn’t have hit the dog if he was in his truck instead of on it?
He says the dog was going 70 on his trucks roof
I try not to be a grammar Nazi, but at this point, the next time I hear someone confuse “in” and “on”, or use “floor” when they mean “ground”, I hope they stub their toe so hard the entire nail gets ripped out.
It could have been a typo, I and O are next to each other on the qwerty keyboard.
But why, exactly do we ride in a car but on a bus? Or sleep in the bed but on the couch?
“Get on the plane, sir.”
“Fuck you! I’m getting in the plane. Let Evil Knieval get on the plane.”
You’re on the bus, in a seat, but if the bus driver finishes the day and left his hat behind, his hat is in the bus on a seat. Active/private/static vs passive/public/transitory. You’re generally in buildings but on vehicles, unless that vehicle is both private and enclosed. It’s not much more complicated than in[side] vs on [top of]; just keep in mind that it’s predicated on whether or not the encapsulatory nature of the object is necessary to its identity. For instance, you could also ride on a flat parade float without walls or roof, and putting a box on it to make it a bus doesn’t change that, so it remains ‘on’.
Why was the dog driving his truck
I mean I guess that’s why he punched the dog, ran onto the highway at 70mph and stole his truck.
Damn why’d it die??
Over exertion probably, most dogs aren’t meant to run that fast.
Probably not even the worst thing Keemstar has done.
'Member when Keemstar was a thing?
