• Wilzax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    You could also clean it by putting a cloth in the lowest point it would run to so this sounds like a win to me

    • yuri@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      i think without surface tension it would also just fall out of the cloth as soon as you lift it, because nothing would wick against gravity. in fact of your floor is pourous at all, i reckon the water would just immediately all flow further down and you’d be left with a dry floor.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Without surface tension it would stick to whatever thing attracts it more. And a normal piece of cloth attracts water way more than a normal non-carpet floor.

        But it also wouldn’t flow freely as the GP expects either. Some oils have almost no surface tension, and they are famously a nightmare to clean up.

        As a positive, the water would evaporate faster.

        • yuri@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          the cloth attracts it because of the capillary action pulling water into the gaps therein, and capillary action relies on surface tension! i think without outside forces like suction, the liquid in this scenario would never flow against gravity.

          i think hahah

            • yuri@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              late reply but i ONLY JUST CONSIDERED, the cloth would most likely have some static charge which WOULD result in a literal “attraction force” towards the water!

              physics is so stupid, i love it so much