It’s as hominem to abandon your position and instead insult me, especially after this dumb attempt at a gotcha that is you haven’t figured out also means you agree it’s a sexist slur. So I dunno, good job there genius.
I have. Many times, you refuse to accept the obvious and ignore everything I’ve said that doesn’t support your point. Why should I prove anything to you at this point, you don’t care about the point you care about winning which is why you insult me when you can’t think of an argument.
You’re a bully, so why should anyone play with you let alone me?
It’s an ad-hominem to follow your logic in which you claim that you are now a bigot as a result of this conversation?
Or is it just that your reasoning is beyond goofy?
It’s as hominem to abandon your position and instead insult me, especially after this dumb attempt at a gotcha that is you haven’t figured out also means you agree it’s a sexist slur. So I dunno, good job there genius.
What position have I abandoned? I’ve simply followed your logic that says anyone who uses the word “manspain” in any context is a bigot.
Show me the inconsistency.
You doesn’t respond to a single one, you insulted me that’s called abandoninga position to attack me instead ie: ad hominem.
Nope not at all. I said it’s a bigoted word and if you use it as it’s intended you’re a bigot. This isn’t difficult.
All the parts you’re intentionally ignoring to make your dipshit gotcha point.
So you can’t show me how my conclusion isn’t sound based on the logic you laid out?
I have. Many times, you refuse to accept the obvious and ignore everything I’ve said that doesn’t support your point. Why should I prove anything to you at this point, you don’t care about the point you care about winning which is why you insult me when you can’t think of an argument.
You’re a bully, so why should anyone play with you let alone me?
No you haven’t.
This is what we’re doing now?
That’s really up to you.
You can either demonstrate how your logic doesn’t result in you calling yourself a bigot, or concede that you are one.
You keep saying it’s an ad hominem, but I’m not saying your argument is invalid because you’re a bigot.
I’m saying either your logic isn’t sound, or if it is, then you must conclude that you are a bigot as a result of it.
You refuse to concede that your logic isn’t sound, so therefore…