• Mr Fish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Again, that’s from getting it to stick to things. The smaller PTFE chemicals that make it possible to suspend Teflon in water are the problem.

    • Rooskie91@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      12 days ago

      Teflon is the brand name for for the chemical Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Making PTFE requires PFAS, which are the toxic part. Think of PFAS as little bits of chain varying lengths that get strung together to make the larger PTFE molecule.

      The argument you’re making sounds similar to something like “Fossil Fuels are safe, it’s just the CO2 that’s dangerous.” PFAS contaminated water being released to the environment is an unavoidable by produce of making Teflon. You can only make Teflon as a solid without suspending the PFAS in water first.

      Here’s a pretty good video about the history, manufacturing process, and toxicity.

      https://youtu.be/SC2eSujzrUY

      • Rednax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        There is one important note: you won’t get cancer from the Teflon in your pans. You get it from the PFAS used to produce the pans. This means you don’t have to throw out all your pans, as if they were made from lead and asbestos. Just make sure not to buy new ones with Teflon.

      • ExFed@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        The argument you’re making sounds similar to something like “Fossil Fuels are safe, it’s just the CO2 that’s dangerous.”

        I didn’t read it that way at all. Their argument sounds more like “there’s nuance that you’re glossing over.”

        It seems that we all agree PFAS are generally nasty chemicals, some worse than others. Teflon (polytetrafluoroethylene) is just one of the “nicer” ones.

        • BakerBagel@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          You can’t make teflon without the PFAS though. It’s like saying AIDS is completely different than HIV

          • 9bananas@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 days ago

            no it’s more like saying “desalinated water is fine, it’s the brine that’s problematic.”

            which is true.

            and the same goes for teflon:

            the PFAS are toxic, not teflon itself.

            glossing over that distinction is disingenuous…

            yes, you can’t make one without the other, true, but the end product is not toxic. that’s an important difference you can’t just ignore in order to say teflon is toxic, because a requisite material in (cheap) production is toxic.

            because that’s like saying desalinated water is toxic, just because brine is toxic…which is obviously ridiculous.

            • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 days ago

              ie if you already have a teflon thing, that teflon is non-toxic and there’s no point to just throw it out… avoid new things if possible because they byproducts are harmful, but disposing of existing product is unhelpful

            • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 days ago

              ie if you already have a teflon thing, that teflon is non-toxic and there’s no point to just throw it out… avoid new things if possible because they byproducts are harmful, but disposing of existing product is unhelpful