NASA, with the tampons.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I get the impression they were also preparing for a potential freak discovery where it turns out zero G has an extreme effect on the menstrual cycle, and they suddenly need a lot of them.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you have a sample size of 0 and a backup plan of “crash and burn”, it does make sense to be extra careful with the preparation.

    • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      How long could the shuttle stay up there if it was deemed unsafe to return?

      They might have been preparing to orbit for long enough to launch a rescue mission.

      100 is probably still to many. I’m suprized they didn’t just buy a box of them, or ask the manufacturers, who surely have the most data on average tampon consumption.

      • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 day ago

        Why ask the manufacturer about the average consumption when you can ask the person in question about the real consumption?

        • squaresinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Tbh, the story was reported by Ride on a talk show for laughs. It’s not exactly a well-documented incidence.

          Likely, the package they ordered had 100pcs in them (because it’s meant for commercial clients) and they asked her something like “We got 100 here, how many do you need?”

          It’s of course fun to insinuate that NASA engineers have never been close to women and thus have no idea how tampons work, but it’s more likely that this was just played up for laughs at a talk show.