Justice Department leadership is prepared to use its rule-making authority to declare transgender people as mentally ill and deprive them of their Second Amendment right to possess firearms, according to two Justice officials who shared internal discussions with CNN.

Deliberations at the highest levels of the DOJ follow the recent mass shooting at Annunciation Catholic Church in Minneapolis, an attack police say was carried out by a 23-year-old former student at the church’s school who may have been a transgender person or a de-transitioned individual. Two children were killed in the attack, and 21 others were injured.

  • PostaL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    43 minutes ago

    If at least half of the republican supporters are not mentally defective, I don’t know who is…

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I saw the headline a day or two ago about how they wanted to remove their guns, and my first thought was they’re going to declare them mentally ill.

    Sigh

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This is probably just another distraction. I don’t think the executive brach has the power to declare someone mentally ill for the purposes of existing gun legislation. They would need a new law through congress, and they won’t get enough votes for that.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Legislation? That’s so old school. The really important stuff, like repealing Constitutional Amendments, is all done by Executive Orders these days.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I am not into guns but I am into that group name! “Activate interlock! Dynatherms are connected! Infrashells are go! Let’s go!”

  • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    The right has never supported gun ownership for groups they consider outside “American identity” just look at Reagan’s actions while governor.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Any clear-thinking individual has always recognized that the party that will be the first to restrict gun ownership will be the MAGAs.

  • rayyy@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 hours ago

    First they came for the gay’s guns…

    It is important to set up a system to confiscate guns. Try it on a small group then expand gun confiscation group by group. Eventually a loyalty pledge will be required, then conscription.

  • Rooskie91@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The right is about to learn the very important lesson that support of gun control does not necessarily imply a lack of gun ownership.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    What does the Massie family Christmas card have to do with it?

    Look, Massie sucks, but I know they’re mad at him right now, so it’s an odd choice of image given the article is about the DOJ.

  • (des)mosthenes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    the sheer irony. i’m about to spin up a site that tracks metrics of MAGA vs the rest of the country in crime and fatalities