• pixxelkick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The incident was caused when smoke was pushed in the wrong direction because of negative pressure, according to Assistant City Administrator Kevin Iffland.

    That sounds like it wasn’t a method specific issue, and if anything had been burnt in that incinerator it would’ve caused the same issue.

    Sounds like the facility wasn’t setup right, any facility with an incinerator should definitely have positive pressure, not negative.

    • alekwithak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      So we’re blaming the facility that has never had any issues incinerating previous to this event, rather than the FBI for their clear incompetence? And y’all are not only buying but upvoting it, too? Okay.

      • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        15 hours ago

        rather than the FBI for their clear incompetence?

        The article has not stated who was responsible for operation of the facility.

        It’s more likely the responsibility was on the staff to ensure the equipment at their own facility was functioning right

        This sort of error should have been covered by prior operation licensing checks, a facility with an incinerator on premises shouldn’t have negative pressure issues

        So something somehow caused a negative pressure issue.

        Usually the culprit is some kind of exhaust fan being run, or a door being left open too long

        Based on time of year and how hot out it is, I wonder if a staff member left a door propped open or something.

        Incinerator systems need positive pressure overall.

        Anyone who lives in the north and has a gas based furnace heating system knows how deadly negative air pressure can be…

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Damnnnnnn critical thinking really is dead.

        The universe around us isn’t black and white. Have you considered that two things could be wrong instead of one? 😲

        Generally though, a facility that operates in a particular manner that is used in the manner in which it is supposed to operate and it fails to operate in the expected manner. That’s a facility problem.

        Human error included.

    • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Naw, someone failed procedure and didn’t turn on one or more fans. They probably should have told the director, she could have turned the fan on.

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Which is both an incompetence and a facility problem in this case.

        Systems like fans when an incinerator is active shouldn’t rely on a human to flip switch. This should be automatic or there should be a lockout system that prevents the incinerator from operating if certain conditions are not first met.

        • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Maybe, I’m not sure how the things work. It’s entirely possible that it uses 150% more energy due to heat loss when the exhaust is on so there’s a procedure in place to pre-heat without ventilation and then use the fan for each incineration, returning to an idle state in between each.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      … Why are they incinerating there in the first place though. I would figure that government entities would have procedures on confiscating, labeling, storing, and disposing of evidence in a safe manner. Not just throw it in the local animal shelters incinerator lol.

      • Fondots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I know that when police in my area need to destroy evidence that’s no longer needed (and can’t just be disposed of in normal waste streams, or sold or what have you) they normally take it to a local garbage incineration plant.

        There was also a steel mill in the area at one point and their furnace was occasionally been put to use for similar purposes (tangential - there was at least one instance I’ve heard of where the US mint used that furnace to dispose of a batch of coins they were testing a new alloy or process or something on)

      • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Read the article:

        The incinerator is usually used by animal control officers to dispose of euthanised animals, but local authorities said it can also be used by law enforcement to burn seized narcotics.

      • dantheclamman@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Maybe in the area of Montana they were limited in choices, thought this place would do, but did not do a test run to ensure ventilation, leading to terrible results. Perhaps the unit was seldom used and poorly maintained (the fact that there were kittens in the same room as the incinerator seems crazy to me)

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yes, it just seems like a comedy of errors here, unfortunately the animals and staff suffered the price

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Absolutely, but it seems to me like the FBI should be covering all.expenses here. They fuck up, and we have to cover the bill.

  • Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Anytime the abbreviation or acronym includes the word, “Federal”, you can be sure it was done incorrectly and at the greatest expense to the taxpayer.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      During this admin, no doubt about it. Previous ones at least had competent leadership that were hired for their expertise instead of loyalty, however.

      • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        loooooottttaaaaa people still in the government trying to do some good, it’s a shame the admin is making them look bad.

        the admin of course is not trying to do any good and is going to ruin anything they can