• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Don’t they though? They have (slim) majorities in both chambers, can’t they push this through if they really wanted?

      • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        60 votes are not required. That’s for cloture to end a filibuster.

        The filibuster is not in the constitution nor a law, its merely a rule that can be changed at any time and the rule change itself cannot be filibustered. vance could also preside over the senate and ignore the parliamentarian.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      They could if they can whip enough republicans to change the filibuster rules, or just get vance to preside over the senate and to ignore the parliamentarian. They never did that because “norms and traditions”.

      But this party that’s ignoring the constitution for the past few months… and somehow “norms and traditions” suddenly matters now… 🧐

      • snooggums@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        If they wanted to pass this they can change the rules which only requires a simple majority. They want to keep the current rules because it allows them to shut down the Dems when they are in power and Reps are fine with the government being shut down since their goal is to gut it anyway.

        There is no reason for Reps to change the status quo, because this is what they want.