• worhui@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    So Sony is now the new RCA. This is a new low for the company. I can’t believe that they are gone just like that.

    • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Well, their TV brand is gone. Their headphones are still the top tier of consumer stuff and price-performance king for studio headphones

      • notthebees@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Idk if I used a really bad set of wh1000xm4s but they sucked. Too bassy and muddy. Like more than they should have. I hope their studio headphones are much better in that regard.

        • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          Maybe it’s just because I’m an audio engineer so I was able to EQ them to my taste, but I love my WH-1000XM4 cans. But yeah, their studio cans are both top tier and dirt cheap. MDR-7506, they’re like $80 and generally sound like a million bucks because they’re used in basically every single recording studio as reference headphones.

          • notthebees@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            That’s how I eqed the set I borrowed. I had no eq in Deezer and it was a downloaded flac. It still wasn’t great but better than stock.

            • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              I have mine set like this. Clear bass can be adjusted further down, just depends on personal taste. 400Hz is the boomy, buttery part of the range so if there’s too much boxy-ness you can turn that down judiciously. Keep in mind most musical pitch lives there too, though.

              My preferences are towards a relatively flat sound so my setting reflects that

  • J52@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    The only negative thing about my TCL tv is that it’s running Google tv launcher. I replaced that with Projectivy.

  • TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I had a TCL phone for a bit about 10 years ago and it was the hottest piece of garbage I had ever touched in my life

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Sony’s modern OLEDs are sick. There are a few between my family, and they have the best processing I’ve seen, they decode massive bluray rips no problem, and native options for a clean ad-free UI.

    Why TF aren’t people buying them?

    • dmtalon@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      For me, for my use case it’s primarily because of the size TV I want. Mine is going in the basement on a wall where I want the biggest TV I can afford. That means I could get an 83" screen in OLED or a 98-100" QLED. 15" difference is pretty dramatic.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Oh man, you’re missing out on OLED in a basement though. It’s so fantastic for dimly lit evironments that I’d take the smaller size any day, and just sit a little closer. LCDs, on the other hand, look pretty terrible in a really dark room.

        The only thing that would make me pause is if you’re trying to squeeze a big family around the TV. In that case, it would make sense to get a bigger one, so everyone can sit farther back without compromised viewing angles.

        • REDACTED@infosec.pub
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          It’s the main purpose of them, yes. Define TV to me. I don’t see the point of paying for decoders, smart TV and bunch of other things I’ll never use, much smarter decision is to buy a monitor which focuses on image quality and performance, far more suitable for consoles, Roku, etc.

          Commenter above low-key described that OLED as a monitor more than a TV

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            TVs are fantastic monitors.

            It sounds reasonable to not want to pay for basically a small computer inside the TV.

            But in practice, its not that expensive of a component. And TV volumes are so high that they’re bigger and cheaper and higher quality than an equivalently priced monitor, anyway.

            Hence, while I’m fine with the monitors I have, I’m never buying a “monitor” again. It just makes no financial sense when I can get a 40" 4K TV with 120hz VRR instead, that happens to work fantastically as a streaming box too.

            • REDACTED@infosec.pub
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              My experience is that they all look terrible up close, for whatever reason. TVs are essentially designed for further-back viewing