• modus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    How about, “murder that stale cracker?” Does that evoke sympathy in his tiny heart?

  • fira@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    He might change his tune when he realizes the alternative is guillotines….

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    2 days ago

    Roth on Tuesday stressed the significant contributions of the city’s wealthiest residents to its tax base and said these members of the so-called one-percent are “not enemies” and are “at the top of the great American economic pyramid for a reason.”

    There it is. The “we’re better than you and deserve more” conceit.

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      That reason: they are so pathologically greedy that they grubbed up way more money than anyone could need and more than anyone else around.

      • tmyakal@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        If all it took to be rich was pathological greed, there would actually be even more billionaires.

        It’s pathological greed and generational wealth.

    • brax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Interesting how they’re there for being stains on humanity, but they think they’re special.

    • Breezy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      No not at all. How can you compare making people pay taxes they owe with people talking about eating them.

      Let there be millionaires and billionaires, but they have to pay a lot of taxes for how much they get.

      Some billionaires pay less in taxes a year then poor people do.

      • DaGreenGobbo@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Let there be no billionaires. Let the maximum wealth be £/€/$10m, depending on the country, obviously.

  • kvasir476@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    He really won’t like what people replace ‘tax’ with if they’re not allowed to say “tax the rich.”

    • Triasha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Wealth inequality is killing quality if life. We would like to put that wealth to productive use through taxation and government investments, but setting it on fire (metaphorically) would still leave the average person better off.

      If we can’t tax it or destroy it, then people will be pushed further and further until they have nothing to lose, and after that, things will get ugly.

            • ultrafastsloth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I actually agree what I think he meant was that the rich would rather be killed than taxed. Maybe it was just phrased poorly

              • Johnmannesca@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Yeah, killed just means they’re estate gets taxed during inheritance but by that point thay’re dead so it’s illogical to care. Much more realistic a narcissistic personality grasps for ways to avoid any unsavory changes in wealth status vs literally dying. They aren’t afraid of their life insurance policy activating, actually they might even look forward to it in a strange way.

      • youcantreadthis@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Right up until the moment it is.

        Everything dies. We literally do not know how to stop this. We’re real good at helping it along though.

    • blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Reading this as the Aerosmith song blasts bc my anarchist small child demanded to watch the music video before school right now!

  • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    Some of them were born this way I suppose lol. They are a self-selected group of greedy people. There has never been an easier group to vilify, because they are literally villains, hoarding resources that others desperately need

    • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Imagine thinking you’re better than others because you’re good at amassing wealth.

      Everywhere around you people are suffering but because of your innate superiority you are not only not suffering, you have far more than you could ever hope to need, and you cling to it white-knuckled like it’s going to stand up and walk away.

      Congratulations, you are the smelliest sphincter.

      • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        The interesting thing is that the media trained us to admire these people, and listen with bated breath to their advice. When in fact they are the last people we should ask for any kind of moral guidance. Their greed has made literally every major societal issue worse. Fortunately, I think that illusion is dissolving, and more and more it’s a majority opinion that the rich are too rich and it needs to stop. Lots of disagreement on how to stop it, unfortunately

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Haha wow he really tried to throw some antisemitism in there too.

    “I must say that I consider the phrase tax the rich — […] to be just as hateful as some disgusting racial slurs, and even the phrase ‘from the river to the sea,’” Roth said.

    I think you get a good peek into the psyche of powerful people when they use inappropriate terms from marginalized communities as a shield against just actions or comments made against them. It implies they see those genuine complaints from minorities as something merely performative - a tool for sympathy, a shield from criticism. It reveals narcissism and a lack of empathy.

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      Israelis are not a marginalized community for the record despite their victim playing, but I take your point.

    • theolodis@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      From the river to the sea is not antisemitic. In the Palestine before 1947 Jews, Christians and Muslims all lived side by side as neighbors, and none of them had spwcial rights or was threatened.

      What that sentence does mean though, is that there would be no jewish apartheid ethnostate that is actively stealing land left and right, and starting wars with people they see as inferior.

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh I know, that’s just the card he’s trying to play (the same card Israel uses regularly, ‘any support of Palestine = antisemitism’, ‘any criticism of Israel = antisemitism’).

        Appreciate your comment though.

        • theolodis@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Ah, I misunderstood your comment then, it’s true that Israelis try to play that card (quite successfully so).

          I’d recommend putting the fake “antisemitism” (because not all anti Zionism is antisemitic) in quotes, to make it more clear.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Is he implying that he believes “rich = Jewish”? Because if so, how anti-semitic of him.

      I have no qualms with working-class Jews.

      Likewise, I think all billionaire oligarchs need to be taxed at higher rates. (Currently they’re taxed less than the working class; being compelled to pay your fair share isn’t prejudicial!). Race/ethnicity/religion simply doesn’t factor into it.