• TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    208
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Put your money where your mouth is and open source the Tesla software. Do it. I fuckin’ dare ya.

    Edit: we want Falcon 9’s landing guidance software too.

    • evidences@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Open sourcing the falcon 9 software would almost definitely be a violation of ITAR… On second thought it would be fun to see him go to prison.

    • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      I want a world where anyone can go to space. It the thing I wanna do the most. But I’m not rich and I’m no super smart and I have awful health.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        We gotta figure out a better way than strapping ourselves to a continuously exploding bomb and pulling some serious Gs for 8 minutes.

        Wonder how some of those SSTO space plane projects are doing…there was a British one I can’t remember. Used hybrid air-breathing scramjets, switching to internal oxidizer once it was going fast and high enough.

        Edit: here is is and I was mistaken it’s not a SCRAMjet https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylon_(spacecraft)

        • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Space planes carry along heavy-as-fuck wings, control surfaces and a lot of other bullshit that’s only useful inside the atmosphere, and which massively increase fuel consumption for every single maneuver while your space plane is actually where you want it to do stuff - in space. And the only benefit is that the atmosphere helps lift and fuel your vehicle to about 10% of orbital velocity. The other 90% it will have to accelerate just like any other rocket.

          The SpaceX approach is much better: Land and reuse all parts of your rocket, but don’t carry them with you further than where they’re useful. Rockets leave the atmosphere where wings would work within a few minutes anyway.

          • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah but…most people’s grandparents aren’t going to be riding rockets. This isn’t sustainable for widespread access to space.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Do you really want countries like North Korea, Iran and China having access to software that would certainly be used for missile guidance?

      • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Why not. If everyone has it, everyone will be afraid to use it, because they know everyone else has it, but what they don’t know is how many have developed a working prototype.