• HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    We only have 2 options for president.

    This kind of thinking is how you end up with only two options.

    A third option emerges when enough people say “I am not voting for either of those two”.

    You either vote for one of those two or you are ok with either.

    Or, it means you’re not okay with either.

    We need to push for Ranked Choice Voting (or anything better than FPTP).

    Canada has FPTP voting and still manages to have four federal political parties.

    Australia has ranked ballots and effectively has a two-party system that hasn’t changed in 80 years (though they do sometimes manage to get some independents elected to parliament)*.

    I’m not saying the voting system is irrelevant. But the true obstacle to multi-party democracy is the fact that voters think in a polarized two-party way (that you are currently reinforcing).

    * This is a description of Australia’s House of Representives. Their Senate uses proportional representation, and does have more than two parties. And technically Australia has three political parties in the House of Representives, but two of them have been in a permanent coalition since 1946 and are often treated as a single entity, with the result that Australians consider themselves to have a two-party system.