• qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 months ago

    Is there any consensus as to the internal organs/stuff which maybe doesn’t fossilize well? Like, did they just evolve a bitchin’ chassis but they’re constantly tinkering with the internal bits?

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      In truth, the modern horsehoe crab is different than its ancestors, just not as much as usually occurs in several hundred million years. So Frank was really more like, “Eh, maybe a little, but not much.”

    • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      Fossilisation has a bit more to do with deposition conditions than the creature itself. It’s why we know next to nothing about jungle dinosaurs and ones around mountains. Most of our knowledge comes from marine and wetland dinos.

    • BoxedFenders [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      They would most likely look the same but there are still evolutionary changes deeper in the DNA that aren’t visible like metabolic and digestive functions. A modern horseshoe crab would not be able to reproduce with one from a 100 million years ago despite looking virtually identical.