If democracy itself is on the line (and worth defending) then why are you trying to get people to vote about it as opposed to do political violence about it?
If democracy is on the line then why is the entire democrat party saying “no no no, it’s bad to try to harm your opponents!”?
If you realized the democrats couldn’t win, would you vote third party, assuming there was one that aligned more with your own politics?
As I said before, my vote isn’t symbolic, it’s an immutable record of what platform a party needs to get my support. I’m not voting as a symbol or to send a message but to record my politics and to get my choice of party the material institutional support that comes with more votes.
Because that’s how democracy works… Civil war is the result of democracy failing. I said it’s at risk, not dead.
If you realized the democrats couldn’t win, would you vote third party, assuming there was one that aligned more with your own politics?
No, %100 not. If they lined up with every single view I had. Because they will not win. Money wins elections right now, that’s the cold hard truth. And 3rd party will never be able to compete. If there was rank choice voting, where the system wasn’t two sided, sure I would. But without that I would at least be able to influence which of the two people we get, and this time I want the one that hasn’t claimed he wants to lock up the other side and admits to wanting to be a dictator. That’s who you are helping by casting a 3rd party vote, you are making the best chance to beat him that much weaker.
Your vote is symbolic. It will not impact this election at all, me and you both know that. And if democracy is on the line and you take this time to “record what your party needs to support,” then you are naive. What you think your party needs to support means nothing if there is not another election. So go ahead, record what you think politicians should platform on; just know that if one side wins, what you think is important doesn’t matter anymore. I’d rather vote for the side that still gives democracy a chance than try to fix it instead of letting it die so I can record my thoughts and feelings.
So it’s wrong to defend democracy with force, you’d never cast a vote for a party other than the democrats, my vote is both meaningless and also super powerful, I should switch over to voting democrat and democracy will die if I don’t.
It’s not wrong to defend it with force but context matters. Are you defending from a foreign policy you don’t like or is it defending against your right to vote. You can fight for democracy but it doesn’t always need to be violent.
Trump recently admitted that if Republicans vote him in, you won’t have to vote again, he’ll “fix it.” So yes, by you not voting for the best chance to stop him you are very powerful. You’re siding with a future that may mean not having to option to vote again, which would lead to violence. But sure, vote for whatever makes you feel good. The rest of us will vote to protect democracy for you to have the right to throw away your vote.
So, again, you believe that trump is an existential threat to democracy but do not believe it’s necessary to defend that democracy with violence.
There are only two possibilities I can come up with, you either don’t actually believe trump is an existential threat to democracy or don’t believe democracy is worth defending.
I guess you could just have never thought about it that hard either.
Is it possible that you think violence is okay if it’s directed against foreigners but not if it’s directed against Americans?
I’m convinced that your not even reading my comments. That or you think it’s impossible to defend democracy using democracy. But either way, just busy your head in the sand and vote for whoever makes you feel warm and fuzzy.
Then you end with this gem “Is it possible that you think violence is okay if it’s directed against foreigners but not if it’s directed against Americans?” Which is a baseless loaded question. You clearly have no interest in a genuine conversation and are incapable of having an honest one.
Is it possible you don’t care about democracy and are arguing this line of reasoning because you want the US to be ran by a dictator? See how silly loaded, presumptuous questions are.
You literally posed the question in regard to violence “are you defending against a foreign policy or is it defending your right to vote”
I mean, I guess you could be suggesting that stopping, for example, the genocide in Palestine is worth fighting and risking death to stop but preserving democracy isn’t.
If democracy itself is on the line (and worth defending) then why are you trying to get people to vote about it as opposed to do political violence about it?
If democracy is on the line then why is the entire democrat party saying “no no no, it’s bad to try to harm your opponents!”?
If you realized the democrats couldn’t win, would you vote third party, assuming there was one that aligned more with your own politics?
As I said before, my vote isn’t symbolic, it’s an immutable record of what platform a party needs to get my support. I’m not voting as a symbol or to send a message but to record my politics and to get my choice of party the material institutional support that comes with more votes.
Because that’s how democracy works… Civil war is the result of democracy failing. I said it’s at risk, not dead.
No, %100 not. If they lined up with every single view I had. Because they will not win. Money wins elections right now, that’s the cold hard truth. And 3rd party will never be able to compete. If there was rank choice voting, where the system wasn’t two sided, sure I would. But without that I would at least be able to influence which of the two people we get, and this time I want the one that hasn’t claimed he wants to lock up the other side and admits to wanting to be a dictator. That’s who you are helping by casting a 3rd party vote, you are making the best chance to beat him that much weaker.
Your vote is symbolic. It will not impact this election at all, me and you both know that. And if democracy is on the line and you take this time to “record what your party needs to support,” then you are naive. What you think your party needs to support means nothing if there is not another election. So go ahead, record what you think politicians should platform on; just know that if one side wins, what you think is important doesn’t matter anymore. I’d rather vote for the side that still gives democracy a chance than try to fix it instead of letting it die so I can record my thoughts and feelings.
So it’s wrong to defend democracy with force, you’d never cast a vote for a party other than the democrats, my vote is both meaningless and also super powerful, I should switch over to voting democrat and democracy will die if I don’t.
It’s not wrong to defend it with force but context matters. Are you defending from a foreign policy you don’t like or is it defending against your right to vote. You can fight for democracy but it doesn’t always need to be violent.
Trump recently admitted that if Republicans vote him in, you won’t have to vote again, he’ll “fix it.” So yes, by you not voting for the best chance to stop him you are very powerful. You’re siding with a future that may mean not having to option to vote again, which would lead to violence. But sure, vote for whatever makes you feel good. The rest of us will vote to protect democracy for you to have the right to throw away your vote.
So, again, you believe that trump is an existential threat to democracy but do not believe it’s necessary to defend that democracy with violence.
There are only two possibilities I can come up with, you either don’t actually believe trump is an existential threat to democracy or don’t believe democracy is worth defending.
I guess you could just have never thought about it that hard either.
Is it possible that you think violence is okay if it’s directed against foreigners but not if it’s directed against Americans?
I’m convinced that your not even reading my comments. That or you think it’s impossible to defend democracy using democracy. But either way, just busy your head in the sand and vote for whoever makes you feel warm and fuzzy.
Then you end with this gem “Is it possible that you think violence is okay if it’s directed against foreigners but not if it’s directed against Americans?” Which is a baseless loaded question. You clearly have no interest in a genuine conversation and are incapable of having an honest one.
Is it possible you don’t care about democracy and are arguing this line of reasoning because you want the US to be ran by a dictator? See how silly loaded, presumptuous questions are.
You literally posed the question in regard to violence “are you defending against a foreign policy or is it defending your right to vote”
I mean, I guess you could be suggesting that stopping, for example, the genocide in Palestine is worth fighting and risking death to stop but preserving democracy isn’t.
Help me understand what you wrote.