The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoEver wanted to see a human hand under a microscope?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1750arrow-down119
arrow-up1731arrow-down1imageEver wanted to see a human hand under a microscope?lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareSmuuthbrane@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·1 year agoI always thought I’d be able to see more hand, not less.
minus-squarefossphi@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·1 year agoYou need a macroscope for that, common mistake
minus-squareTrafficone@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoThis is because the microscope blocks photons. OP should use a gamma camera or x-ray to see through the microscope body.
minus-squarestephen01king@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoBut microscopes does work by making you see less of the whole thing, but instead filling your vision with the little part of the thing you see.
I always thought I’d be able to see more hand, not less.
You need a macroscope for that, common mistake
This is because the microscope blocks photons. OP should use a gamma camera or x-ray to see through the microscope body.
But microscopes does work by making you see less of the whole thing, but instead filling your vision with the little part of the thing you see.