• BigDiction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    If this is like California, the proposition process allows the gathering of signatures and if enough are collected, the proposition goes to the ballot for direct democracy vote, bypassing the legislature in many cases.

    I’ve never heard of police going to verify signatures directly. But it’s not technically voting.

    • yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Similar in Florida, after enough voted the amendment is placed onto the ballot and needs to get over 60% of votes on election night. I’ve never heard of officers investigating indivual petitioners, but petition / signature fraud is illegal, so I don’t believe this is technically voter intimidation.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh it’s definitely voter intimidation, they’re just using the law as a thinly veiled excuse to do it.

        If someone put their name down for something, and the cops come knocking on their door about it, how many people do you think are really going to follow through and vote.

        If they can find you because of a signature, they might find how you voted. And who’s to say they’ll just be asking questions next time.

        This is classic mob tactics.

    • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Generally, verifying signatures is a function of the Auditor’s office, but who knows, maybe the swat team does that in Florida.