• lud@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    For anyone else using reasonable units that’s 198,12 cm and 154,94 cm respectively.

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            No, but it doesn’t matter. I just provided the exact measurements because I was copy pasting anyways.

            • grozzle@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 hours ago

              When the original value is only precise to plus or minus half an inch, it makes no sense whatsoever to do a conversion that’s a hundred times more precise.

              • lud@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                9 hours ago

                It’s more precise and took no extra effort. 🤷

                Why is it bothering you so much?

                • grozzle@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 hours ago

                  It’s not more precise. A man says he’s 6’2".

                  Sure. If he’s anywhere between 6’1½" and 6’2½", that’s true.

                  You say he’s 198.12cm tall. The range of this being true is now thinner than a needle. It has gone far beyond what anyone actually measures. In over 99% of cases, it’s not true, and if it is, it won’t be for long, because the human body isn’t nearly that consistent from breath to breath.

                  The conversion with spurious false precision has made the number go from true to not true.

                  The man is six foot two, yes, true. The man is 198.12cm - no he isn’t.