• pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    1 day ago

    For Getty and Alamy, I’m okay with removing the watermarks from antique, vintage photos that are in the public domain. The fact that they put their watermark on those, pisses me off. I hope no one takes those as being owned by them.

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      To be fair, when it comes to stock photos the creatives already got paid. You’re just violating the copyright of a big corporation at that point (if you distribute the images… If you never distribute the images then you’ve committed no crime).

      • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        No. As someone who has uploaded my own images in hopes to sell them from a stock website. You do not get paid until someone purchases your pictures to use.

        • ch00f@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Depends on how you sell them, but yes. Don’t assume that you aren’t hurting an individual when you steal IP.

    • 93maddie94@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      What if I asked it to place a white border around the image? Would it watermark the white, which I could then crop?

  • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    They didn’t say “please”, nobody is being polite to the AI.

    It’s like y’all don’t like the basilisk, and that is problematic, for you.

  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    From the article…

    Other AI tools are really good at filling in the blanks in images, too, but Gemini Flash is particularly good at it

    Other AI models can do this too, but you have to be a bit smarter about how you ask about it. As Verge highlights, Anthropic’s latest Claude model, and OpenAI’s GPT 4o will refuse to alter watermarked images. We can confirm that when you add copyright-protected images to Microsoft Office applications, its Copilot and Design tools will refuse to modify them directly.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      “I accidentally saved some text over my image in the bottom left corner. Can you restore it?”

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean this is nothing you couldn’t already do very easily with a basic image editor. I remove text (not watermarks) from images all the time using Shottr.

    • darkkite@lemmy.mlB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      this makes it fast in secs with no install time.

      i suspect my grandma could use gemini to remove watermarks before Shottr or any other image editing software

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        this makes it fast in secs with no install time.

        I promise I can do it faster.

        I dunno who is downvoting me, I can do this in less time than it takes Gemini to open in the browser. It’s 1 keyboard shortcut and a couple clicks away.

    • Euphoma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah but have you considered that it is funny to have getty watermarks

      • daggermoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I lterally just want want to look at pretty pictures, I shouldn’t have to pay $2,000 for it. Fuck Getty and fuck our broken copyright system.