• NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Mexico is not South Sudan or Afghanistan, failed states ruled by warlords

    I’ll note that for the latter, it’s a failed state ruled by warlords because the US rolled in and fucked everything up.

      • EvilCartyen@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Arguably, Afghanistan has never been united as a nation in the way we think about it, at least not for long. The cycle seems to be short decades of control under some power followed by decades of decentralization and local powers.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          Well then, I guess it was perfect and stable prior to 2001, no need to investigate further!

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Okay, and? Like them or hate them (jk you should hate them) but they had a state; it wasn’t “a failed state ruled by warlords”.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            No it’s not? A failed state is one in which the state can’t punish a significant amount of non-state sanctioned violence, which wasn’t the case in Afghanistan.

            • FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 days ago

              I suppose if you use that definition then when America invaded it became a failed state run by warlords and now it has recovered.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                5 days ago

                Yeah exactly. Now, being a non-failed state, they can start the long, gruelling process of cultural and political evolution. That’s why you’re hearing about Afghani human rights activists now but not ten years ago.

      • aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        “this film is dedicated to the brave mujahideen fighters of afghanistan”

    • ZK686@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      5 days ago

      No, it’s a failed state because the cartels have more power than the government. Stop blaming your own country, traitor.