Israeli soldiers have begun in recent weeks to set fire to homes in the Gaza Strip, following direct orders from their commanders, without the necessary legal permission to do so, according to information obtained by Haaretz.
Soldiers have destroyed several hundred buildings using this method over the past month. After the structure is set on fire along with everything inside it, it is allowed to burn out until it is rendered useless.
When asked about the new practice, an Israeli army commander told Haaretz that structures are selected for burning based on intel. When asked about a building that was set ablaze not far from where the interview took place, the commander said: “There must have been information about the landlord, or maybe something was found there. I don’t know exactly why that house was set on fire.”
Three officers spearheading Gaza fighting confirmed to Haaretz that setting homes on fire has become common practice. A commander of one battalion told his troops last week, as they were wrapping up operations in a specific Gaza area: “Clear your things from the house, and prep it for incineration.”
I want to be very clear here - the alarm bells should be going off for people. This is whole thing is genocide… There are 10 Stages of Genocide.
WE ARE AT STAGE 8.
-
PERSECUTION: Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity. Death lists are drawn up. In state sponsored genocide, members of victim groups may be forced to wear identifying symbols. Their property is often expropriated. Sometimes they are even segregated into ghettoes, deported into concentration camps, or confined to a famine-struck region and starved. They are deliberately deprived of resources such as water or food in order to slowly destroy them. Programs are implemented to prevent procreation through forced sterilization or abortions. Children are forcibly taken from their parents. **The victim group’s basic human rights become systematically abused through extrajudicial killings, torture and forced displacement. **Genocidal massacres begin. They are acts of genocide because they intentionally destroy part of a group. The perpetrators watch for whether such massacres meet any international reaction. If not, they realize that that the international community will again be bystanders and permit another genocide.
At this stage, a Genocide Emergency must be declared. If the political will of the great powers, regional alliances, or U.N. Security Council or the U.N. General Assembly can be mobilized, armed international intervention should be prepared, or heavy assistance provided to the victim group to prepare for its self-defense. Humanitarian assistance should be organized by the U.N. and private relief groups for the inevitable tide of refugees to come.
Edit: apparently Lemmy double posted. I’ve removed the lower copy.
Brother we’ve been in stage 8 since the first nakba in 1948
Seems more like stage 9 to me.
-
It’s another great day to say fuck israel.
“Necessary legal permission”?
Its fine you guys: the Israelis have decided its legal for Israelis to burn down Palestinian houses that a Hamas fighter once stopped beside to tie his shoelaces.
Yeah basically admitting it’s state sanctioned. Should save the South African lawyers some paperwork.
deleted by creator
Your comment was double posted, you should probably remove one of them.
Not to mention he forgot to number them making the whole thing a big wall of text.
No it’s n°8
N degrees to the power of 8? 🤔
No need for multiple posts.
This is the only one I posted though…did Lemmy glitch or something?
We wanted 21st Century Sherman in Texas, not in Gaza.
Any confirmation from another source?
Haaretz is an israeli newspaper and the IDF commander is admitting it personally. How much source are you going to ask for?
In fact, if memory serves, Haaretz is the biggest newspaper in Israel other than tabloids and the de facto state media rag Times of Israel and as such one of if not THE most reliable source from inside of Israel.
Israelis supporting what their state is now like how this is too - they can allow such newspapers and TV channels and civilized people to exist and talk and protest, thus getting the benefit of pretending that it’s a pluralist western democratic state.
Did you miss how the Israeli government has been actively trying to censor Haaretz since they started doing proper journalism on what’s going on in Gaza? There was even a political attempt to get them shut down.
There are such “attempts” all the time. Maybe they are a bit more material now, but in general this is very soft.
I think I know what you mean and you’re partly right: Haaretz is still an Israeli paper and as such has a pro-Israel bias.
It’s also a left-leaning paper, though, so it’s against genocide and bigotry and extremely critical and always has been of the fascist Netanyahu government and the apartheid system they’ve created.
Times of Israel is analogous to the NY Compost, Haaretz is closer to something like The Intercept.
and as such has a pro-Israel bias.
I didn’t mean that, though this is true (in the sense that they sometimes cry thief where there is murder and murder where there is massacre).
I meant that for them to be a problem for that political system they have to pass a certain threshold of power and they don’t do that, while for them to be a benefit for it there are no thresholds.
A bit like Russia (EDIT:…n opposition) in 2007.
that they sometimes cry thief where there is murder and murder where there is massacre
They don’t. You’re confusing them with the likes of ToI and Jerusalem Post.
for them to be a problem for that political system they have to pass a certain threshold of power and they don’t do that
Yeah they do. For all the undemocratic shit, Israel still has a certain degree of press freedom.
Haaretz are a constant thorn in the side of the government and the government constantly complain about them, but they couldn’t significantly censor them, let alone shut them down, without sparking widespread riots in the streets.
For all the undemocratic shit, Israel still has a certain degree of press freedom.
I was trying to say that this press freedom impedes them (the government) insufficiently to prevent them from doing what they want the most, but the fact of it still existing is very actively used by Israeli propaganda.
There are plenty of people involved, some of the baddies may consider them what you said and some may think what I described. Probably more of the former.
Not the kind of confirmation you are looking for most likely.
