• Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Assigning a value of 5 to pi, although ludicrous IRL, doesn’t affect the problem. Plug the values into the equation and it will still give an answer that’s correct in context.

    • Opisek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      For the benefit of doubt, maybe the test is from an alternate dimension that doesn’t use euclidean space.

    • ftbd@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      If the goal is to avoid calculations with decimal places, why not just leave Pi in the result?

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Technically no, because pi equals pi not 5. But you can approximate its value as 3 or 5 or whatever you want, knowing it’s not exact and that your result will only be an approximation. I mean you could also ask how long light takes to reach us from Alpha Centauri if the speed of light is 1000 mph. It’s not, but if you make that a condition of the problem you can do the calculation just fine.

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I think that reason would make it “Technically Yes”, since False (pi = 5) implies False (cylinders exist) is (vacuously) True (“absurd premise”).

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Cause it’s just a (n-1)-dimensional ball extruded along the remaining axis, or do all 3d shapes exist on (nearly) all 3d metrics?