• Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    So then let me ask you this. Why did you agree the top 200 are the richest? Why is 200 such a magic number? By your logic it would actually just be the top 100. No wait top 50. Oh wait no, literally only the richest person is the richest, because you can’t have a bigger group, or else you have to include the entire earth for some reason. Because a bigger group of the category “richest people” contains that single richest person.

    So the Republican party isn’t the worst, because there’s a single member of it that is the actual worst. So whoever we vote for is the lesser evil, as long as we don’t vote for literally just the single guy that is the worst. Makes sense right?

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Because the original argument didn’t have a number, was R vs D. If R are the most evil, I don’t care if D is the second most evil, it’s a clear choice.