• Allemaniac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Cars should take up between 1/2 and 2/3 of the lane they actually occupy

    tell that to the stupid F-150s. 2 Seats, no aisle, and subjectively wider than a bus

    • Mpatch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Between 1988 and now the f150 only increased in width by .9 of an inch. Parking spots are set by the size of the f150 because they are consistent and abundant.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yeah but they were massive to start with, they’ve always been huge.

        Europe has smaller parking spaces because Europe point blank refused to accommodate larger vehicles just because. The US is so obsessed with cars that the idea of going “no that thing is stupidly big we’re not accommodating it”, is not an acceptable thought.

        • Mpatch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Europe didn’t refuse to accommodate larger vehicles. The simply couldn’t. All the towns are significantly older than the oldest town in the USA. The town streets are narrower, and can’t support the weight of larger vehicles. If there wasn’t that constraint, there would be ltz suburbans everywhere.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s because it has to accommodate wide arses. If you ever sit in one of their seats you just sort of get lost.