• CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Other people view porn too. Do you now find everyone disgusting?

    No. I don’t find porn in general disgusting. I find furry porn disgusting because it borders on bestiality. You obviously know that’s what I meant. Don’t be obtuse.

    Also, what’s the source of you claim that over 70% of furries view furry porn?

    https://furscience.com/research-findings/sex-relationships-pornography/5-4-frequency-of-porn-use/

    And how does it matter? They’re individuals, and can make choices on their own.

    They are individuals and can make choices on their own. However, I have already expressed why I think it matters. I personally believe the furry community is harmful toward the LGBT movement. Regardless, it matters simply because it’s the truth and there is a major misconception that being a furry isn’t a kink because it isn’t inherently sexual, despite the fact that it is a kink for the majority of furries.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      I find furry porn disgusting because it borders on bestiality.

      The only reason bestiality is really a problem in the real world is because of the intelligence/sapience difference between humans and animals.

      That doesn’t exist in the fantasy worlds of furries, where the human-animal hybrids all have human-level intelligence.

      You’re using the same logic that made Australian authorities ban women with A-cup breasts from being porn actresses: ‘female children don’t have large breasts either, therefore porn of a flat-chested woman ‘borders on pedophilia’’.

      Ridiculous.

      • CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        No. It’s clearly not the same logic. I have no problem with anyone’s body shape. If an actress were to act out the role of a child in an adult film, then I would have a problem. Since you want to take it there, then I’ll point out that you are using the same logic as the people who claim certain art is not pedophilic because the child’s body is canonically inhabited by a thousand year old soul. Is that context readily apparent? Is that context entirely relevant? I would argue it is not.

        • tsugu@gregtech.eu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Is that context readily apparent

          Yes.

          Visible human emotions, walks on two legs, exhibits clear intelligence (talks, reasons, makes jokes, etc.)

          They are called anthropomorphic for a reason. Nobody wants to fuck a real wolf.

    • Lena@gregtech.euOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I personally believe the furry community is harmful toward the LGBT movement.

      The same logic is used by transmedicalists to call non-binary people harmful to LGBT because they are “weird”. The rest was perfectly explained by @damnedfurry@lemmy.world.