• sunbeam60@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Do the government ministers understand that setting up your own VPN is literally a 5 minute operation.

    Hire a droplet VM, pre-installed with a server OS. Log in with provided credentials. sudo apt install docker Copy/paste a docker compose file that sets up a wg-easy container. Create a peer. Take a picture of the provided QR code. Connect to the server via a wireguard app. Done.

    Are they going to ban VMs?

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Dame Rachel de Souza told BBC Newsnight it was “absolutely a loophole that needs closing” and called for age verification on VPNs.

    Saw that coming. Can’t have the populace living their lives without constant, repressive government scrutiny.

  • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If they were really after kids watching porn (or even porn in general) it would be technically somewhat simple to force ISPs to provide filters on their end as a subscription service. I’m pretty sure I’ve even heard that kind of services in the past. Make it even opt-out if you really want to.

    That way ISPs would just ban everything from pornhub and others unless you spesifically want it allowed or even provide a portal where you could block reddit, twitter, tumblr or whatever you wish on your account. That kind of technology already exists and it’s used on many corporate setups.

    There’s obviously ways around that, but there’s no technical way to block every possible way to move bits between computers. Even if they would shut down the whole internet there’s still ways to build mesh-networks or even buy USB-drives from a shady alley.

    But as we all know, it’s not about porn and not about children.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You can’t block porn completely without blocking VPNs. If you connect to a VPN that’s all they can see. They can not see what you use the VPN for.

      • jim3692@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 hour ago

        You can’t block VPNs without blocking the entire internet. You can block known VPN services, but you can’t prevent people from hosting their own.

        Some known VPN protocols could be blocked, using introspection tools. However, this would just render corporate VPNs useless. VPN traffic is just bytes, and so is WebSockets. Good luck figuring out whether my HTTPS traffic is legitimate internet traffic, or masked VPN traffic.

      • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        VPN, Tor (and similar, like I2P), every imaginable P2P network, proxies, all non-http protocols (smtp, ftp, nntp, xmpp and other instant messengers and so on) can all transfer any kind of data, porn included. And a ton of other things. Heck, I’m quite sure there’s a minecraft mod where you can assemble JPG-images out of the blocks and view them that way. And then you can use stuff like uuencode where you can use anything that can move plain text to transfer binary data.

        There’s no way to block all of that unless you shut the whole internet down. And even then you can still trade good old playboy-magazines with your friends. VPN in itself has very little to do with the actual problem, beyond that someone apparently noticed that their current “save-the-children” iteration had pretty large holes in it.

  • Baggie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Why are the kids technologically illiterate and undersexed until it comes to matters of government control? I’m not usually into tin foil hats, but this doesn’t feel like the kids are the primary concern here.

  • fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Clearly it’s a parental problem to determine if the VPN they are buying for their kids is being used to wank off, but apparently this party of ‘liberty’ has an unhealthy obsession with monitoring our children’s genitalia these days.

    • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Unfortunately, neither Labour nor Conservatives are parties of liberty, although there are some individuals within both that see the importance.

  • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    10 hours ago

    You ban something, and people will always find a way around it. Always.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yup, and that’s how the US got the Mafia. We banned alcohol, but people wanted to drink, so the Mafia made that happen.

      All a ban does is hurt law abiding citizens and businesses.

      • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 minutes ago

        This is a fairly revisionist history version of the mafia, they were here for decades before prohibition. One might say that they profited greatly from prohibition, but to suggest they began with it is incredibly incorrect. I hate to be the actually guy but I find organized crime fascinating and I can’t let this one go

  • NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    When they effectively make the internet a dangerous place, Usenet will rise from the darkness. P2P will also always exist and these politicians dont understand computer math, so a lot of what they’re trying to accomplish is bound to fail.

    • 𝄞 Inkstain (they/them)𓆩 𓆪@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      As someone who just read the Wikipedia article on Usenet and doesn’t know anything else about it: Would this be pretty much the equivalent of the internet before search engines? Because if so I’m really intrigued

  • Photuris@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    11 hours ago

    We didn’t see this one coming a mile away.

    Palantir execs and shareholders are buzzing with anticipation.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It’s a bit like “my kids will only eat chocolate” and the therapist’s response “where are they getting the chocolate from?”. If the kids are using VPNs then where are they getting the money for the VPN from? Is this parental consent?

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Which is an anticipated problem too. Because those free VPNs are harvesting all of your traffic to sell; If you’re not the customer, you’re the product being sold. Almost as if opponents of the ban said this would happen, and would only work to push kids towards sketchy sites…

  • Lembot_0004@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Stop ministers making laws to… why the fuck they even do this bullshit? They are a government, they know everything about everyone even without such primitive control methods.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The people pulling the strings have obviously decided that internet freedom is a threat to them and they’re taking (global) action to ensure their supremacy.