Man, if only he had a gun on him, then he could have protected himself.
Well people wanted gun control and now it’s coming… Just not for everyone’s guns.
He’s not that important. They aren’t touching guns. It’d be great if it happens, but remember, Sandy Hook didn’t change anything.
This will be used to push the “LGBTQ+ people are mental illness and can’t have guns” argument. It doesn’ matter if the shooter is queer, or even found; this incident is going to be used in the rhetoric.
They’re coming for someone’s guns. It just won’t be their own.
Sandy Hook didn’t bring change because they don’t care about protecting children. They do care about protecting themselves however.
Yes, this is one of their own. Though it reminds me of their Epstein problem where they have tied their own shoelaces together on an issue.
Who am I kidding, watch them vacillate for a minute on the number of guns there should be, before deciding on “more”.
It’s not great if it happens, it’s impossible
Let’s be real, we have more guns than citizens. To change that fact would be the work of a generation
My thoughts and prayers in written form about this:
Swiggitty swooty I desire that Jesus booty
9/10 never forget 🦅
It really was 10 out of 10 though
The same way that current immigration policies aren’t dictated by emotions /s