• Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      22 hours ago

      He’s not that important. They aren’t touching guns. It’d be great if it happens, but remember, Sandy Hook didn’t change anything.

      • Glide@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        This will be used to push the “LGBTQ+ people are mental illness and can’t have guns” argument. It doesn’ matter if the shooter is queer, or even found; this incident is going to be used in the rhetoric.

        They’re coming for someone’s guns. It just won’t be their own.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Sandy Hook didn’t bring change because they don’t care about protecting children. They do care about protecting themselves however.

        • harmbugler@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          Yes, this is one of their own. Though it reminds me of their Epstein problem where they have tied their own shoelaces together on an issue.

          Who am I kidding, watch them vacillate for a minute on the number of guns there should be, before deciding on “more”.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It’s not great if it happens, it’s impossible

        Let’s be real, we have more guns than citizens. To change that fact would be the work of a generation

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The same way that current immigration policies aren’t dictated by emotions /s